Onomatopoeia

joined 1 week ago
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 10 hours ago

I've worked for very large organizations (30k+ employees) that didn't use crappy paper.

All depends on the company.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 31 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ooh, good Ole malicious compliance.

Make it a check.

Even better, pay with visa. The processing fee will be more than 23¢

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 18 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

So I know whether to waste my time

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

"Devitio"

I expect no less from AI garbage, haha

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

"raw dogging the Internet"... I chuckled out loud

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One day, after I am done with -insert reason here-, I will have a bad ass, well thought out backup solution.

For some reason you're "insert reason here" was dropped by lemmy. I guess a sequential less-than/greater-than messes with it.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 18 points 1 day ago

Right?

$450 and a toaster to use something like the external batteries I've used for a decade.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

Nope.

Just watched them all a few weeks ago, still very funny, see nothing wrong with any of it. The movies are all about absurdity.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Have you seen the books?

I know someone in a place like this, and to move there they essentially sell any property they have to buy their space in the facility.

It's not cheap, but these places also provide on-site medical facilities with trained staff so someone 65 having a stroke has a decent chance of being OK.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 day ago

62 is first year of social security eligibility.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

Exactly.

Someone older than a teen understands we have a responsibility to bring people together, create a trusting environment, focused on the job at hand.

So even when someone brings up politics, I simply don't respond, or just ask a work question. Because I know most people doing this want to have their viewpoint validated, and I probably don't agree in some way. This situation helps no one, and just promotes divisiveness.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Work is for work, not for political bullshit.

Political bullshit is alway divisive, and we all work too damn hard to build cohesive teams.

I've seen it many times - if you're one of those that is compelled to bring outside bullshit to work, where we have enough actual related issues to contend with, you'll be left behind. People won't want to work with you, I because you're not a team player and more interested in discussing political crap (or reality TV crap, or whatever) than discussing the very real issues in front of us.

We already don't have enough time for the tasks at hand, last thing we need is such juvenile nonsense.

You want to talk politics, do it on your break, away from me.

And your freedom of speech bullshit argument is nothing more than a sophistry tactic known as a strawman. This reveals you to be a sophist, not interested in discovering truth, but rather in winning an argument.

You even led with castigating me, and continued on with denigrating.

You should probably revisit your intentions and ethics.

view more: next ›