Lyrl

joined 1 year ago
[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

The problem is the very pro-death penalty camp wants the dying process - not the being dead part after - to be the punishment. The pro-humane camp is generally anti-death-penalty enough they don't get a seat at the method-decision table.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

Alabama tried that and managed to screw it up. You have to remove the carbon dioxide in the exhales to prevent the feeling of suffocation, and they didn't provide enough nitrogen flow to do that. Took like twenty minutes of clearly desperate gasping and convulsions for the guy to pass.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's likely really surprising to learn/experience that feces of a breastfed baby (and to a lesser extent formula fed babies) don't smell like shit. It's natural to want to share a surprising learning. Might also be good to be forewarned the milky smell ends once normal food is introduced.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Does Arizona not have an online free system? Illinois has a very hand-holding guided set of questions and has for years, it's always been our federal taxes that make my head hurt to fill out via the IRS's FreeFillableForms site.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Her son died of cancer as a young adult. I have wondered if the abdominal xray while she was pregnant contributed to that.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Modern industrial farming is not sustainable for the next hundred years, no, but there are a lot of levers to work to transform it into something that will reliably feed future generations.

One lever is amount and kind of meat in the average diet. It takes something like seven pounds of grain to make one pound of beef. Modern chicken breeds are amazingly efficient at converting feed grain to chicken meat, but even they are something like two pounds in to one pound out. Reducing the percent of meat in our diets would make our food go significantly further.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

The plants use energy from the sun to turn carbon dioxide from the air into edible calories. When our animal bodies "burn" the food we eat, that turns it back to carbon dioxide, which we exhale.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

The energy input is the sun, and most of the calories come from the air (carbon dioxide). Given so much external input, harvesting from a plot without reducing soil fertility is totally possible. With nitrogen-fixing crops (soybeans being the poster child), even the nitrogen fertilizer comes from the air.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

This is more like you measure the fragment speeds with both a laser and with radar, and get different readings off the same fragment.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It used to be more true, when straight chlorine was what was used. Now most municipalities use chloramine, which is more stable. Most plants don't care, but it's an issue for fish, so there are "water conditioner" products for aquariums that remove both chlorine and chloramine.

view more: next ›