Oh, I'm not blaming you at all, I'm just commenting on the article
Logical
joined 1 year ago
Misleading title. Not incorrect, but it is based on what the source of income is, it is not about how rich you are relative to the rest of the population. The title makes it sound like if you make a certain amount of money, your tax rate is lowered. Alternatively, it sounds like the richest Dutch are evading 12% worth of taxes. But neither of these are true statements AFAIK, and either way they aren't made in the article, so the title is misleading.
Edit: Changed "the top 1%" to "the richest Dutch".
Tbh I feel like this is sometimes the case. Whenever I've looked for really cheap basic one-color t-shirts, the lowest cost ones usually have a brand logo on them.
I agree with that, it's important to consider what's being advertised and in what way.
"Here, eat a caterpillar, you'll feel better."
I considered it before I switched from 7 to 10, but since 10 still makes it possible to create an offline account and disable most of the spyware and other bloat, I opted to stay with Windows for another generation of OS. 11 is different though, it's several steps too far into proprietary hell.
I've been dipping my toes into it over the years, I'm just not ready to make it my daily driver quite yet
The second Win 10 stops receiving security updates, it's Linux for me.
I've seen their ads in Sweden before IIRC. They don't seem to be very common though. Why don't you like that they're advertising?
Since when is Joe Rogan bad enough to warrant getting shot in the first place? I feel like the guy has said some bad (and far more dumb) things but it's not like he poses any kind of danger to anyone does he? I know this is besides the point, but murder is far from proportional to anything (that I am aware of) that Joe has been known to do. With that said I don't really know much about what he's been up to for the past 5 years or so.
This post made my head hurt
Fair point, albeit a different one from the one I was making.