LifeInMultipleChoice

joined 1 year ago
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I've been trying to work out the part where I keep getting partially phased into brick walls. The double jump appears to be not meshing well with the engine. Never happens with stone walls, wood, nor any others... just brick.

They simply bathe in mothball filled water

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Small thing" and you immediately go to infinite wishes haha

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same bullshit as always. No one will end up paying an amount that will "re-pay" sufficiently. Instead it just goes back to hoping tech advancments move us to cleaner energy quickly.

(Aka. If they were going to pay x per footprint, they instead would pay x/y)

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

More likely it would just get negotiated that costs needed to be less per emissions and then they had x years to make efforts to prove they are mitigating as much as possible. And the same old shit would carry on as it is right now.

(Not saying this is what I want, just that this is how it seems)

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Measure by emissions within your country. If China allows a company to operate within their borders they are responsible for said fees. Pass the fees to those companis if you wish, but they are their lands. The companies will move elsewhere if the fees are to high or find alternative ways to do business producing less emissions. It really isn't tough to figure out.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You realize that paying C02 emissions based on capita for a country makes no sense. If you believe a country should be paying than it pays per country impact. So that would stipulate that China needs to be paying twice what the U.S. does.... which I somehow imagine you aren't going to agree with.

That site made the article unreadable for me. : /

You're beautiful to all of us!

Not going to ask a Chiropractor anything even if they are an MD. At first I was going to say they all specialize... but chiropractors... nah just going to play it safe and tell them I'm fine.

Each instance is its own. They are different communities in different places. Turning on thr news in Moscow is going to be different than turning on the news in Kiev. Both groups are discussing similar topics but they likely have tuned out and brigaded different opinions until the community only discusses 1 view openly and all others get downvoted out. Lemmy isn't 1 site, so organizing it may be more difficult.

If you turn on the news do you think acquiring all of your information is best from one news channel? Soon as a community grasps a bias they start to hivemind and tune out counter points. I believe having multiple communities with multiple biases to be more secure.

view more: ‹ prev next ›