Inthe case of the actual membership, members would be obligated to do at least something when Russia attack. In the case of fiction membership NATO might just budapesht-memorandum around.
Lemmist
joined 4 days ago
Bacause in the case of "Future Russian Aggression" NATO will find literally THOUSANDS reasons why Ukraine can't join or why that "Agression" isn't agressive enough to call the 5th article.
And mostly used by Americans, American.
They prefer lawmaking.
Ophthalmologists hate you: you apparently have excellent eyesight.
I'm not sure if that was sarcasm, because in the world where countries such as Russia and the USA have nukes everybody should have them too. I'm Ukrainian and understood this on my own practice.
Do they at least use real corn?
view more: next ›
Please stop telling this joke. It stopped being fun a few thousand iterations ago. And it wasn't a good joke in the first place, to be honest.