Ledericas

joined 1 week ago
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

could be something like a private sub, where only approved members can enter.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

thats why they have been aggressively going after OF subs/bots this month, they arnt getting a slice from the profit they are earning externally. from another forum,(where people flee after getting banned this way) alot of them lost tons of accts recently. yup one of my accts was temp ban for using the report button, how many is too much? it depends on the mod and the sub, if they dont like that you are reporting are reporting a person that should be reported, or the comment, you get banned for report abuse. these bans seems much severe than a subreddit ban.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

i also wonder if they are going to push something like subscription tiered system, like subscription with ads, or a "free sub with ads"

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

probably going to bury the "free" groups til they cant be seen in a feed, and promote the paid ones to the front page 100% of the time. much like how youtube does it, the most "paid" popular channels get 100% front page coverage.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

sounds like they are coping

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yes it was the one saved gamestop from getting destroyed by a investment group/ and a PE firm, the ones that destroyed (toysrus,sears,red lobster), if seen the ceo of SEARS he looks pure evil.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

its actually pretty hard to use the site as a new user, thier ban filters,botting filter is set so high right now its easy to get banned, or your comments removed, immediately, even if you are using illicit evasion methods.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

like the users were telling OP OF those posts, not to spend what they dont have, but the op dint listen and spent 100sk on a stock and lost it all, or only gained back a marginal amount. they just heard "~~dont~~ spend"

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i saw that 750k guy that spent on intel around the same time the chip fiasco, that was funny. and the guy 500k from thier inheritence or rich daddies birthday gift.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

a handlful of the mods actually own hundreds of subs, like less than 100 owns like 500 subs. they arnt definitely not going to give up that power, they have so many thousands or hundreds of thousands of minions.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

even the banning X link was such a weak protest, how about banning all twitter related posts, because the site gets most of thier engagement from x-based posts.

view more: ‹ prev next ›