InternetPerson

joined 4 months ago
[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It was already ruled that they failed to sufficiently disclose which information was used and how.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/australia-court-fines-facebook-owner-meta-14-mln-undisclosed-data-collection-2023-07-26/

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is not evidence that they’re using your microphone, and you know it’s not.

I didn't claim it to be evidence for that.

somehow bypassing Google and Apple’s mic usage notifications

Unless some form of hardware notification is hardwired into the device, which indicates cam or mic usage, I'm on the rather paranoid side regarding software notifications. Software is usually much easier to break. I'm leaning a lot out of the window now, as I don't know how secure those notifications are implemented. However, even then there is reason for concern, given that facebook had / has questionable deals with device manufacturers. If they were willing to share personal data with device manufacturers, there is reason to suspect this went or can go the other way around as well.

I don’t know why you keep coming back to trust. [...] That’s not the point.

It is mine. Even though there is no evidence for a surveillance using device microphones itself yet and it could be surprising if they were able to, given the history of facebook, they participated in a lot of rather surprising shit.

Aye. Facebook has been proven to be shady af over and over again.

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

it wasn’t in secret

Did I misread something? It even says in the title of the linked article, that it was a "secret project".

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world -2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The evidence is: among other things, facebook has repeatedly violated user's privacy. It would be no surprise if they would also monitor conversations via the microphone. Sure, currently there seems to be no evidence for that. But I wouldn't be so naive to just trust them on that.

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world -3 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Yes. Just another malicious thing facebook does. Surely, they are totally trustworthy in all other regards. /s

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 6 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Security researchers can and probably have tested for this and found no clear, verifiable evidence, otherwise we would have known.

Facebook snooped on users’ Snapchat traffic in secret project, documents reveal

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks for sharing!

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

As far as I know, there is no such list (yet).

What should be done:
Escalate it to the people responsible for IT administration & security in your company or institution. They'll deal with it.

But the default step if you suspect of being infected is not to use the device at all until you got a green light for it from the security/admin folks. Power down, disconnect from any networks, either via physical cables or wireless, unplug external storage devices and wait for further info.

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

Oh ja, richtig. Ich bitte um Entschuldigung!

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago

Ja, sogar auf mehreren Instanzen. Das ist aber auch das Problem. Zersplitterung, statt ein einzelnes Zuhause dafür zu haben. :'(

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

*gemacht mit ~~Mematik~~ Maimatik

view more: next ›