Hugohase

I don't agree with you but either way that doesn't change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.

There are just better/faster options...

Maybe you can get something out of here

I always use a factor of 1200 as approximation e.g. 1GW produses 1.2 TWh per year but thats very very rough.

If this is ever deemed feasible the world will already run on renewables. There might have been a time for NPPs but 2024 ain't it.

Corruption

TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!!!!1

Wir wissen alle was ihr macht...

Utility PV in Australia has a capacity factor of ~25%. So those six GW of PV will produce approximately the same amount of energy as the biggest nuclear reactor in Europe Olkiluoto 3 which took 18 years to build instead of 2.5.

It's a few hours behind and they have obviously problems with behind the meter production. Adfitionally, the values for CO2 emisdions are off (i.e. nuclear is calculated with 5g/kWh, this is 1/3 to 1/10 of the values you find in literature) But all in all, you can see the trends of production and im- export.

This is happening, to a degree, in most of Europe. Storage is the answer as described in the article. Unfortunately politics are not proactive, you need to break the system before something happens... and now the system is broken, yeah!!!

While this is true, Austria has, for the first time ever, built more than 1GW of PV in 2022 and more than 2GW of PV in 2023. As a result 98%+ of electricity production have been renewable in April and this also holds true for Mai so far. All in all, good news.

Yeah, but they are...