Both signal and molly are considered safe, a lot of apps use the same protocol as signal, most risk come from messages leaks before the encryprion happens.
Unfortunately, I'm not aware if they did external audits, but both codes are available in github.
The status quo isn't proof that controlling what people do is possible?
Seems like a problem of logistics, the controlling of public opinion.
I understand that is hard to not carry all the world problems, specially for empathic people.
There's a hardened "version" of signal called molly
Indeed, the majority of us aren't made to worry about arbitrary problems that are beyond our control constantly more than trivial and survival related problems.
In my opinion there's not a meaning as in purpose, the things you said are what is expected, I think people exist just to be, to experience being alive or to experience death maybe.
Some affixes and suffixes also say the category of a medication or effect, they are very useful, but they are not based in the brand name, but the drug name.
It's a competitive salary, because it is a salary and you have to compete with others to have it.
Now just go to work and casually say " I'm feeling very senior today" .
It's almost as if there's a pressure on one, but not on the other.
Also because most phones have operational system's that are more secure than Windows, so a app is a easy way to block everybody that don't fit a profile of optimal users and avoid problems/hacking.
Companies dream of a closed internet accessible only from a controllable environment.
That's a big one, you can disable it, but if the other person has it enabled there is a possible leak after decryption also.