Eyeuhnluuung

joined 1 year ago
[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

With healthcare systems and churches as some of the biggest offenders.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I regret adding the “free” part because I didn’t intend my comment to be about cost. But in terms of convenience, is it really so much more inconvenient to bring a reusable water bottle with you to the store? Why add to a landfill by getting a disposable cup every time you go?

Since we’re on the topic of cost though, do you know how much 16oz of water from your tap at home costs on average? 3 one hundredths of a cent. Thats about a penny and a half a year if you go to the grocery store once a week.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s a good thing you have a free water dispenser at your house and reusable water bottles are a thing.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Except Sabro for me. Tastes like gin, which I hate.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People drink coffee at the pub?

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

More likely he’s using meth.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I have to do prior auths sometimes. Always get this line which makes me think what the fuck am I doing this for?

“Prior authorization is not a guarantee of payment. All final payment is subject to the members eligibility and benefits at the time of service”.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No need to make the internet a worse place.

More Reddit-y here by the day…

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not a gun owner myself, so curious, is your carry gun not always locked up when not on your person?

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 113 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The irony here, is this is the kind of vague and obtuse fuckery online casinos and sportsbooks pull with their customers all the time.

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You go, no you go, no you go, you go, no you go

[–] Eyeuhnluuung@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is unequivocally content neutral to initiate a new place restriction before any content is expressed in that place. If they subsequently allow other protests in that place, but continue to restrict Gaza protests in that place, then it is not content neutral.

Your second question is either disingenuous or involved zero actual effort on your end, or both. Obviously this is an emotional subject, but it doesn’t absolve from using critical thinking.

I’m not sure it’s helpful to continue, take care.

view more: next ›