DrRatso

joined 1 year ago
[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, I’m willing to eat my words on that one, for some reason my memory said 6a was 2.0

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Doesn’t that run M2 SoC?

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Someone else commented that the SoC literally lacks the capability to run above 2.0. If this is the case it would be very hard to call this even scummy adjacent.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, well, there you go. Pretty much straight up supports my original claim. If they need to full on change the SoC why in the hell would they fork up to support thunderbolt on iphones.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Two factors. Do they still have lightning hardware sitting on shelves? Do they need to design to fit the iphone form factor? If the answer is yes to either of these, designing for TB this release cycle seems non-sensical when most people only use the cable to charge their phones.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think that is most likely a lot of what drives that divide, but this almost certainly the case for the port. Some shit undoubtedly is software locked, and that is in fact scummy, but new hardware will always be more expensive than hardware you have already designed and maybe even have lying around.

To get thunderbolt in there they probably need a new board specifically for the iphone, while they can just cram in the lightning version with a new solder job and call it a day.

At the end of the day 95+% of the people who will use their phones will only use the port for charging anyway.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago (34 children)

ITT people pretending this is a spite based move, when realistically it is probably cutting costs by reusing the same hardware they used for lightning ports just soldering on a USB-C port instead of a lightning one.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Because they are probably using the same controller, just rewired to usbc, there are videos of this modification being done aftermarket.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The bank takes the cut anyway, it is by and large offloaded to the vendors. The bank takes a nominal “service fee” that I generally “get back” many times over in creditcard cashbacks etc, plus it ensures my purchase. Hard to actually see the benefit of using cash only.

[–] DrRatso@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well it ain't no PG TIPS but it will make a gallon of oddly flavored water

Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

view more: next ›