DominicHillsun

joined 1 year ago
[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'll make the analogy more clear to you. In 1984 the government got absolute information control, thats what you guys are worried about. In Fahrenheit 451 people themselves censored everything that offended anyone, eventually leading to all the books being burnt.

People have opinions, and lemmy is becoming a worse echochamber than reddit.

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How about just deal with it? Internet is meant to be free space, that includes racists, bigots, rednecks, people you disagree with.

Lemmy is worried about 1984 but in actuality is becoming Fahrenheit 451.

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sure, but they are throwing shit in my yard.

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It is suspiciously perfect size.

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

It's an office computer. More or less it is a requirement.

I personally use firefox.

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It seems rather suspicious how much ChatGPT has deteorated. Like with all software, they can roll back the previous, better versions of it, right? Here is my list of what I personally think is happening:

  1. They are doing it on purpose to maximise profits from upcoming releases of ChatGPT.
  2. They realized that the required computational power is too immense and trying to make it more efficient at the cost of being accurate.
  3. They got actually scared of it's capabilities and decided to backtrack in order to make proper evaluations of the impact it can make.
  4. All of the above
 
[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's way bigger than that. Usually cinemas receive movies in multiple terabyte hard drives. Thats because they are using JPEG2000 standard (it varies, but it is close to lossless) and a movie can take up anywhere from 500GB to 2TB (highly dependent on resolution, it can go above 2TB). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_2000?wprov=sfla1

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see :D I guess it is important not to miss those actual sparks of curiousity though

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Great responses in this post. Thank you for additional source

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It doesn't, but at least it makes both think and hopefully improve the quality of the arguments. And with internet at our finger tips, it doesn't take much to double check a couple things :)

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haha, yes that indeed might be a problem! Any idea how to approach this without being incredibly annoying?

[–] DominicHillsun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Problem here is the answer contains multiple explanations. When asking "why?" it needs to be more specific otherwise you get your problem.

 

Many hold strong beliefs and opinions, however not many know the roots of their belief. If a person agrees to explore it, both of you will learn something new and fascinating. The problem is finding someone who wants to think and ask the questions. This goes for both. Many want to "convince" someone, but how much do you truly know about the thing you're trying to prove?

This also comes back to the "why?" game so many kids play. Parents get annoyed by it, but are they really annoyed at the game or their lack of knowledge depth? Play the game, find out how deep you lake of knowledge goes

 
 
 
 
 
 

The deeper you go, the more water above you is pressing down on you. Does this increase water density the deeper you go?

view more: next ›