Corgana

joined 2 years ago
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

He's not really dead. As long as we remember him.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Block and move on. Don't twist yourself into knots appeasing people, focus on keeping the users you want happy.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not trying to victim blame or anything, but I find it hard to believe that someone operating a low-moderation instance would truly expect people who don't like moderation to stay away.

Don't get me wrong I agree with your sentiment and dislike that behavior, but what I'm saying is that asking or expecting users not to go on witch hunts or to behave in a certain way is a fool's errand that will always lead to burnout. A more sustainable approach for admins and mods is creating space for what they want to host and not trying to control what they don't.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In the article they quoted the moderator (emphasis mine):

This whole topic is so sad. It's unfortunate how many mentally unwell people are attracted to the topic of AI. I can see it getting worse before it gets better. I've seen sooo many posts where people link to their github which is pages of rambling pre prompt nonsense that makes their LLM behave like it's a god or something,” the r/accelerate moderator wrote. “Our policy is to quietly ban those users and not engage with them, because we're not qualified and it never goes well. They also tend to be a lot more irate and angry about their bans because they don't understand it.”

It seems pretty clear to me that they view it as a problem. Why ban something if they don't see it as a problem?

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Absolutely. And to be clear, the "researcher" being quoted is just a guy on the internet who self-published an official looking "paper".

That said- I think that's partly why it's so interesting that this particular group of people identified the problem, because this group of people are pretty extreme LLM devotees and already ascribe unrealistic traits to LLMs. So if they are noticing people "taking it too seriously" then you know it must be bad.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeeeeah that user doesn't really understand how these things work. Hopefully stories like this can get out there because the only thing that can stop predatory behavior by corporations is bad press.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What is that from? I didn't see it in the article.

 

Pretty freaky article, and it doesn't surprise me that chatbots could have this effect on some people more vulnerable to this sort of delusional thinking.

I also thought this was very interesting that even a subreddit full of die-hard AI evangelists (many of whom have an already religious-esque view of AI) would notice and identify a problem with this behavior.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

It seemed fine to me....

....oh my

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

Honestly I'm just glad someone is out there doing this work

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Heck yeah! Love when people share this kind of stuff.

 

Thought this was a really interesting read and felt my fellow Website enjoyers might think so too.

 
 
 
 

Very cool to see this topic in a place like Forbes, IMO.

view more: next ›