Ciderpunk

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Not quite. It’s largely because a manager decided that an important metric for Google to be better at was “how much time users spend on the results page” which turns out you can game by just making the results worse so users have to stay there longer. Management made a decision to focus on metrics that are counter to what users would actually want because… well, here’s a better article that explains it:

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

Bold of you to assume Trump knows how to write and the letter was at all legible.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Per the article, the exploit was fixed back in July. Weird to continue to use present tense to describe an exploit that doesn’t exist anymore.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would agree if it wasn’t coming from a cop, the only person legally empowered to murder you and get away with it.

It’s different coming from someone who has the authority to act on that “your life is of low value” statement.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tim was probably on the way out sooner rather than later anyway, but I don’t think the larger problem with the Vision Pro is that the Venn diagram of people who think it’s cool and people who can afford it is way, way too small.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

An Apple Developer account is $99 a year and the only prerequisite to putting an app on the store. If it’s free, there are no other fees. I wouldn’t call $99 a small fortune.

There are many “open source” apps on the App Store, though most may argue they technically are not because you never have the option of compiling yourself, so perhaps “source available” would be more apt. Things like KDE-Connect are on the App Store so clearly there is some demand for iOS counterparts to open source multiplatform applications.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes I’m sure the 7-11 cashier would love for me to try this.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I said generally. Your parents who get paid in local currency for their job are not trading in foreign currencies. The fact that rich people can find ways to squeeze more money out of just about anything isn’t a win for cryptocurrencies.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (9 children)

People generally don’t trade currencies as commodities or treat them as investments. When the same people promising crypto is totally a currency actually start treating it like a stable currency to exchange for goods and services and not an investment or commodity to be traded, I might revisit it. For now, the evangelists refuse to walk the walk.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Hard disagree here, I literally cannot access a cryptocurrency without power but I can absolutely pay cash to buy some water during a power outage.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

The only two countries that accept bitcoin as a legal tender are noted powerhouses El Salvador and the Central African Republic… not exactly world leaders.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago (49 children)

Tangible items can have utility in the real world, where cryptocurrencies can never be anything more than numbers on a display.

Gold can be used in electronics, and I get that people are mad that currencies are just something we all mutually agree have value, but generally speaking powerful governments back those up. Cryptocurrency is backed up by people promising it’s totally gonna be a real currency any second now. Please ignore that crypto can wildly fluctuate in value which generally a horrible thing for a currency to do.

view more: next ›