ChildeHarold

joined 1 week ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you probably didn't even refute my points anyways. just not worth it.

Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*honk honk

Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

lmfao. wut?

Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

tldr yawn

Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy" in c/news@lemmy.world
Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

said the man who couldn't refute literally any of my points (and clearly didn't understand most of them in the first place)

Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy" in c/news@lemmy.world
Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy" in c/news@lemmy.world
Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy" in c/news@lemmy.world
Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy" in c/news@lemmy.world
Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (7 children)

only lack of logic then? ok.

Guns in c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago (9 children)

reread your stuff. if you can't understand how it proves your own stupidity, then you really are hopelessly lost.

view more: next ›