this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
400 points (99.0% liked)

News

23305 readers
3688 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Engine maker Cummins Inc. will recall 600,000 Ram trucks as part of a settlement with federal and California authorities that also requires the company to remedy environmental damage caused by illegal software that let it skirt diesel emissions tests.

New details of the settlement, reached in December, were released Wednesday. Cummins had already agreed to a $1.675 billion civil penalty to settle claims – the largest ever secured under the Clean Air Act – plus $325 million for pollution remedies.

That brings Cummins’ total penalty to more than $2 billion, which officials from the Justice Department, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board and the California Attorney General called “landmark” in a call with reporters Wednesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 50 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I wonder if the fix will nerf the engines like the VW diesels.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 51 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I don't see how it could NOT affect power output.

But the thing about recalls is they're completely voluntary. You don't have to bring your truck in to have it fixed.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago (10 children)

And these are Ram drivers. Like a quarter of them have probably already modified their pavement princess to roll coal.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Not in California. They wouldn't be able to drive it due to annual emissions checks.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You think these guys are too dumb to pass inspection?

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Have you met the average Ram driver? They're usually too inebriated to have coherent thoughts.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

They didn't say "smart". The bar for being able to pass inspection on your vehicle is pretty low!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So how does that work, there is a truck auditor of some sort?

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Every year in states that have safety and emissions testing, you have to bring your vehicle in to be inspected before you can renew your license plate/window tags to be registered to drive on the road. If you fail inspection, you need to remedy the issue and get tested again. You can't drive the vehicle without registration, so you have to correct it or risk fines for driving with expired registration. Inspections are usually $5-15 in most states.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Inspection stations in California will probably check the recall status so that will at least cover that for the State concerned by it.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I have no idea what the penalty is, but I expect these trucks would fail any 'rigorous' emissions test.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Its time to buy a ram if you live not in California

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Sure would be nice if we had a federal vehicle emissions test or even just a safety inspection. At least for federally owned roads.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

these owners aren't likely to bring their truck in to get 'fixed'.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If your bring your truck in to a dealer the dealer often will automatically apply all recalls. Cummins can also get third party mechanics involved. While the dealer or mechanic knows their customer doesn't want this recall applied, they also have various other legal issues that are even more important - dealers may risk their entire dealership if they get caught not applying this recall.

That these vehicles are recalled can also be tracked other ways. If governments really care they will not renew your license without proof that the recall was applied. (I don't think they have ever done this but is in their power)

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

EPA only requires recall tracking for 18 months. After that they give up. Also:

...we (EPA) may inspect or test the engines/equipment only if the purchaser permits it, or if state or local inspection programs separately provide for it.

Enforcement of emissions regulations are very reliant on state inspection programs, and not every state has an inspection program.

In this case, Cummins would only contract with outside mechanics if dealers were unable to handle the volume or modifications. If an owner brings their vehicle to a third-party, Cummins is still responsible for paying for the fix. But in this case the fix seems to be an update to the ECU, which is generally only accomplished at a dealer.

Driver licensing/vehicle registration is handled by the states, and would only be in jeopardy if a state has an inspection program.

The EPA reserves the right to extend a recall program, and in this case the publicity certainly warrants it. But aside from living in a CARB state or having to pass a different inspection, there's no enforcement of recall compliance.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago

Don’t see how it could be any other way.

If Cummins could manufacture and sell compliant engines which met performance goals and customer expectations, they would. Writing has been on the wall for tampering with diesel engine emissions in the US for a while now.

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hope it at least makes them quieter so I can sleep at night but I won't hold my breath.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unlikely. That would require adding in significant sound deadening to almost the entire engine bay and restricting exhausts more than they already are with diesel particulate filters and cats. If you ever check out the car audio enthusiasts, you can see they easily spend a few thousand applying deadening materials to their vehicles and increasing their weight to boot.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We can't move to electric any faster. I hate loud engines. Then you have the trifecta, loud engines, loud exhaust, and booming sound systems. And cops don't give a shit but shit is falling off my walls when they drive by or I feel ill when sitting next to them at a red light.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago

I feel you. Noise pollution is bad in some places. You have to play your music really loud for it to bother people next to you.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

$325 million for pollution remedies.

Yes, pay us, so um, we can….fix…it

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

1.675 billion plus 325 million equals the 2 billion amount Cumins is paying.

Your comment reads like you think Cumins is being paid.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No, I’m saying the government is fining them some for “damages”, but what will become of that money?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Over the course of a decade, hundreds of thousands of Ram 2500 and 3500 heavy duty pickup trucks – manufactured by Stellantis – had Cummins diesel engines equipped with software that limited nitrogen oxide pollution during emissions tests but allowed higher pollution during normal operations, the governments alleged.

In all, about 630,000 pickups from the 2013 through 2019 model years were equipped with the so-called “defeat devices” and will be recalled. Roughly 330,000 more trucks from 2019 through 2023 had emissions control software that wasn’t properly reported to authorities, but the government says those didn’t disable emissions controls. Officials could not estimate how many of the recalled trucks remain on the road.

Stellantis deferred comment on the case to Cummins, which has denied allegations made by the government and is not admitting liability, according to court documents.

The engine maker said in a statement that Wednesday’s actions do not involve any more financial commitments than those announced in December. “We are looking forward to obtaining certainty as we conclude this lengthy matter and continue to deliver on our mission of powering a more prosperous world,” the statement said.

Cummins also said the engines that were cited but are not being recalled did not exceed emissions limits. Punishment for the unreported software is included in the penalty, the company said.

As part of the settlement, Cummins will make up for smog-forming pollution that resulted from its actions.

Preliminary estimates suggested its emissions bypass produced “thousands of tons of excess emissions of nitrogen oxides,” U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland previously said in a prepared statement.

The Clean Air Act, a federal law enacted in 1963 to reduce and control air pollution across the nation, requires car and engine manufacturers to comply with emission limits to protect the environment and human health.

The transportation sector is responsible for about one-third of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, and much of that stems from light-duty vehicles. Limits aim to curb the amount of emissions from burning gasoline and diesel fuel, including carbon dioxide and other problematic pollutants.

“We increasingly are finding that the public health impacts from emissions from cars are really devastating and it is one of our biggest sources also of emissions leading to climate change,” said Jacqueline Klopp, director of the Center for Sustainable Urban Development at the Columbia Climate School.

“To the extent that vehicle manufacturers are trying to evade our emission standards that are our biggest tool for protecting us from these public health impacts and climate change, these kinds of fines for evasion are hopefully a very important deterrent,” she added. “There are profound justice and equity issues around air pollution produced by transport emissions.”

Diesel exhaust is harmful to human health; it’s a carcinogen. Long-term exposure to ozone-creating nitrogen oxides can cause health issues like respiratory infections, lung disease, and asthma.

Officials said Wednesday it was not lost on them that the Cummins settlement follows several other notable emissions cheating cases involving the auto industry in recent years.

Wednesday’s details come seven years after German automaker Volkswagen agreed to plead guilty to criminal felony counts following investigations into its use of similar defeat devices, a massive emissions scandal known as Dieselgate.

The company installed software in certain model year 2009-2015 diesel vehicles across its brands, circumventing emissions standards and emitting up to 40 times more pollution than those standards allow. Volkswagen said 11 million vehicles across the globe were equipped with the pollution controls.

In 2017, the automaker agreed to pay a $2.8 billion criminal penalty in addition to $1.5 billion in separate civil resolutions.

Fiat Chrysler saw similar consequences in 2019 for failing to disclose defeat devices used to make vehicle emission control systems function differently during emission testing. More than 100,000 EcoDiesel Ram 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles were sold in the U.S. with the unauthorized software.

The automaker agreed to pay a $305 million civil penalty to settle the claims of cheating emission tests in 2019.

In 2020, Daimler, the auto parent of Mercedes-Benz, agreed to a $857 million civil penalty as a result of its disclosure failures and claims over its violations of the Clean Air Act.

“There’s a lot of sunk money into diesel engines and people making profits off of diesel engines,” Columbia’s Klopp said. “Unless you give them a really big fine and a really big deterrent, they’re willing to pay the fines to get those profits. That’s really sad because it puts the profits before the health of our communities.”


Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate solutions reporter. Tom Krisher is Associated Press auto writer.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Most assholes who drive those will deliberately not fix them because they want emmisions to be as high as possie to „own the libs” or whatever.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That philosophy is so fucking weird to me.

Do they want to breathe dirty air? Forget the environment for a moment, isn't clean air just nice to have?

Rhetorical questions, I know there's no logic in it.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Real men breathe coal dust and asbestos, clean air is for pussies.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

I have no doubt there are people who legit think this.

[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I wouldn't bring it in because the "fix" will be to hobble the engine and make it worse, namely lower power, and a big decrease in mpg.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Big decrease in mpg? Is the fix going to make the cars less efficient?

[–] hank_the_tank66@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Very likely. Higher NOx out of the engine generally means lower fuel consumption, so the fix will likely decrease the real world mpg that owners were seeing.

I've not yet seen any technical information on the defeat device, but from my time in the industry I can make an educated guess how it will play out

[–] hank_the_tank66@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There probably won't be a decrease in power, as it was likely an aftertreatment issue (sizing, durability, cost cutting) that made them decide to use a defeat device. Cummins would retrofit every cheating engine with a brand new aftertreatment system at great cost rather than reduce the power of their engines. The brand damage of reducing power would far outweigh any repair and warranty costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derpgon@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

Dieselgate II: Carbon Dioxide Boogaloo

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Executives get away with 0 repercussions again!

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like we need another EV charging network made that is treated like a redheaded stepchild like Electrify America is.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Can you elaborate? I don't understand you comment. Didn't most companies agree to a charging standard?

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

People who own them could care less..the more emissions the better probably

load more comments
view more: next ›