this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
81 points (68.7% liked)

Technology

55940 readers
3959 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.youtube.com/@Thunderf00t

I considered hard weather this really belongs in Technology, but came to the conclusion that exposing a scammer that is considered a tech genius, does belong here. Because debunking a technology company is as important as showing it, when it's considered valid.

That said, I believe most people here are already aware that Musk is not to be trusted blindly. But just how bad it really is, may be news to some.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] machinin@lemmy.world 200 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Someone mentioned this and it always stuck with me - never trust someone who makes failure collective ("we dug our grave”), but success individual.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Such a great rule, for real

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

There wasn't even a "we" here... This was 100% Elon being an arrogant dumbass.

[–] Exec@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How about the other way around?

  • (I) I made that mistake
  • (they) We made that mistake
  • (I) We made that success
  • (they) They made that success
[–] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You should look for Last Week Tonight's segment on Elon. I think John Olivers take was fair.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

It seemed a bit too fair to Elon Musk IMO. It felt like John Oliver held back the punches.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Oliver completely neglected to cover the fact that Hyperloop was a scam to defraud the Californian taxpayer out of high speed rail. (Elmo wins doubly: through the government grant in Hyperloop and through Tesla car sales.)

[–] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I was hoping he'd mention more of his "promise X by this year" schtick that he does over and over and never delivers on. Or like showcase the robots being supported by cables walking stifly.

I've seen every Elon video by thunderfoot, I just thought it be helpful to see someone else's critique that is a bit more positive of Elon but cautious.

[–] kpw@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago

Didn't even mention Mastodon once.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

I recommend Some More News. Their shows are more in depth, longer, and musk is a 2 parter. Plus there is a third episode on self driving cars alone.

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 14 points 6 months ago

Very measured take on the man and his contributions, both good and bad. I appreciated that he drew attention to the fact that once people have decided you're a net positive, they just explain away anything bad about you.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 44 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Thunderf00t

Hard pass. Anyone who decided that the shithead reactionary bigots were the side of gamergate they wanted to support isn't getting views from me, thanks.

[–] Subtlysubtle@sffa.community 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Thank you for reminding me about that. Time for a rewatch.

[–] RelentlessArts@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago

I always thought he was legit because he would post great "science" debunking videos and shat on dumb brexiteers. So when I watched the Anita ones I felt the same. Gonna need to watch the hbomber vidya.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Remember Thunderf00t may open himself to lawsuits making these claims publicly. But I'm sure he considered that first, and came to the conclusion, that everything he says, he can document is true. I've run into his material from time to time already from about 15 years ago, and he is 100% a VERY smart guy, that knows what he is talking about.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except about SpaceX, I'm not going to dig though the threads right now, but he's been hilariously wrong about SpaceX in the past. Though not as bad as common sense skeptic though if I'm remembering right.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How is he wrong about SpaceX? As far as I can tell, he is spot on. If a NASA program had as many failures as SpaceX has, it would be closed down. And the economic claims Musk make for SpaceX are insane.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think it was the comparisons to other launch vehicles that were very apples to oranges. But as I said, I'd rather not dig through the Reddit threads to find them. I think they were on SpaceX lounge a few years ago? Common sense skeptic commented, but I don't think thunderfoot did.