this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
783 points (82.9% liked)

Fediverse

28885 readers
465 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it's pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (14 children)

What public info could they gather? My IP?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] dog_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They should, but they're not going to. If mastodon.world isn't doing it, lemmy.world isn't either.

Edit: both mastodonworld and lemmyworld are owned and operated by the same admins and such.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm of two minds about this. I have no love for Facebook and Zuk can go fuck himself. I want Lemmy to be free of the same fucks that ruined Reddit and formally corporatized it.

At the same time, I want Lemmy to grow. I don't want this to be our little corner of the Internet that's tucked away. I don't want an information bubble. I want to see user-managed spaces like this grow and overtake the corporate ones.

So I choose to stay neutral. The two philosophies I described are at odds with each other here. I'll go with what the majority decides -- that's the whole point of it being user-managed after all. I'll just say that I think we should give ourselves options to reverse and monitor any changes as time goes on. We need to see how things progress, regardless of what decision we make, so we can course correct if necessary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Threads content won't show up in your feed unless you go out of your way to follow a threads user. All defederating does is deny your users the benefits of activity pub. If twitter is anything to go by then Threads content will be on this platform through screenshots anyway.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Federate, let them get a taste of sweet Lemmy content, then cut them off. Will make the Threads experience feel broken for native Threads users.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Federate with

Defederate from

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

I think every lemmy instance that is concerned about its users should defederate. If their users start mingling with our communities, the comment sections and the posts would be completely different from what we see today. Today we have a small but passionate user base and should remain that way. New users should know about lemmy and join any instance on their own, and not by their threads client.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›