this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
326 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thought I'd post the PeerTube version.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goodie@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] trachemys@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The website you want won’t let you in with firefox. Only chrome on windows with secure boot enabled and no untrusted drivers or dev mode and https-dns to avoid your pihole.

[–] Goodie@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Which is a possible future.

But it's less likely if more people use Firefox.

[–] Xbeam@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then I don't want that website.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

it's great you have that mentality, but the majority of people will just give in and use chrome

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So, what you are saying is that by checking this trust API, we can filter out everyone running unaltered big-media approved browsers and hardware? We'd end up splitting the web into two disjoint parts, one for big corporate and sheeple - and one more akin to the web of old comprised by skilled tech people and hobbyists? A rift that could finally bring an end to eternal September? ... Are we sure this proposal a bad thing?

[–] 520@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. It's very bad. Your idea assumes that the corporate side would leave the hobbyist side alone and not go on the offensive in underhanded ways. It is very much in the big tech playbook to go on the offensive in underhanded ways.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also the corporate side would be a toxic hellscape worse than it already is

[–] 520@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Not to mention, the corporations know that their startup competitors capable of blindsiding them come from the hobbyist levels. The threat of competition comes from that side.

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Ohh this sounds amazing. Let them go all corporate on Edge and Chrome. It'll be fine for corporate IT and even better for IT and the world. I want my open web back, it's been a nosedive to mega corps for far too long.

Yes it’s a bad thing.

[–] Ultra980@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Like ploum wrote ("splitting the web" on https://ploum.net)

It is hella bad!

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I switched from chromium to vivaldi after Google announced their WEI.

[–] balance_sheet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vivaldi is a Chromium based browser...

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is, but they strip the WEI API from their builds. However, you may want to switch the user agent string to "Vivaldi" because it is "Google Chrome" in the default setting.

[–] balance_sheet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That doesn't solve anything.. it might even be downright bad as you are more prone to being fingerprinted...

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that's always been my primary browser. But I like to use different profiles for each web service I registered at. Switching profiles on Firefox takes some extra steps, so I used Chromium and now Vivaldi.

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Understandable, have a good day!