this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
693 points (97.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19463 readers
15 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 50 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Combine this with Chrome enforcing manifest v3 starting at June 2024, YouTube ads will be virtually unblockable on Chrome, even with an ads blocking extension installed because Google will be controlling the ad blocking mechanism used by the ad blocker. They can arbitrarily reduce the max number of the blocking rulesets, how often the extension can update the rulesets, or even elect to skip running any rulesets that target YouTube or Google domains.

[–] words_number@programming.dev 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I can't wait! Firefox usage will skyrocket :D

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i hope so, but sadly many users are just stubborn and lazy.

[–] Copatus@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's sort of better for the people who migrate then, no?

If the average user just decides to deal with ads that means it won't be worth the effort to go after the minority of people who will be AdBlocking

[–] technom@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They could instead severely cripple or outright block Firefox users. Since we are the minority, it won't affect them. They will just blame it on Firefox and wash their hands off.

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago
[–] technom@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They can arbitrarily reduce the max number of the blocking rulesets, how often the extension can update the rulesets

The size is already just 50. Those who think that adblocking is possible with this are fooling themselves.

or even elect to skip running any rulesets that target YouTube or Google domains.

If anybody acts surprised when it happens, they're probably too stupid to be allowed on the web.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I read in a different post that the code was misinterpreted to be a 5 second sleep before showing the video, but instead was waiting 5 seconds to execute some anti-ad-block script. Still pretty sleazy either way.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

There's a video going around of a guy using a useragent spoofer to prove that it only does this on non-Chromium browsers. So I don't think it's necessarily anti-adblock, but it could be interpreted that way when you consider Google's plans to implement DRM in Chromium.

[–] vpklotar@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Had a look at Louise Rossmans video yesterday about this and from what he showed he got it on all browsers.

Video: https://youtu.be/_x7NSw0Irc0?si=My5Nurw4XqdjDH8l

[–] Solemarc@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

When I went rooting around to find it. I figured it was some QA process that starts 5 seconds after the video loads (the timer seems to be async and the code sends a promise off while it waits). Of course, it's all minified JS so it's a huge pain to read.

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 31 points 11 months ago

normalize memes with monospace font

[–] somegeek@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm really hoping google goes to shit like facebook.

[–] technom@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Facebook for all its nastiness was very much incompetent in influencing the direction of the web. Look at their failed attempts like free basics.

Google on the other hand has the web tightly in its dirty grip. At this point, they aren't even pretending to be nice. Even those plans that cause them reputational damage are brought back in some other name.

The only way to stop Google is for the regulatory agencies to put their foot down hard. They should be divided into at least a couple dozen companies that are not allowed to do business with each other.

[–] griD@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

I really like how my meme proliferates along this 'verse :) I hope the discussions ITT are as nice as in mine.