this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2650 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60087 readers
2636 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corey389@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like Reddit is doing the same shit.

[–] Guster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not seeing this issue on Firefox?

[–] ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If this is true the crowd on here that often says Firefox is really owned by Google because Google pays Mozilla to have their search engine be the default search engine on Firefox really need to look at their claim and rethink their understanding of how Mozilla and Google interact.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not trying to defend Chrome here as I dislike their other behaviours, but just from what's presented in the video, an alternative explanation would be caching. That is, when the reloading is triggered by the switch of user-agent, the cache is reused and thus a shorter load time.

To exclude this effect, the user needs to either

  1. Spoof the user-agent and at the same time clear cache (you can disable cache when reloading through the developer's tool), or
  2. Clear cache, spoof the user-agent to Chrome. Load page, disable the spoofing, reload.
[–] registrert@lemmy.sambands.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. I'm not a frontend dev, so not familiar with JS code (let alone an obfuscated fragment), but according to this HN comment, it's used for a different ad block detection function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xeknos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I can confirm this. I signed up for the free trial of YT Premium (which I immediately cancelled, but I'll take the three months) but YT seems to be detecting that I'm on Firefox and have Ublock installed, so I'm getting the occasional 5 second forced delay, even though I'm a premium user. (They may not count the trial as being a "true" premium user, I'd suspect.)

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I’m seeing this on Safari with the AdGuard content blocker extension as well.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that sounds illegal, it also sounds like Mozilla will see them in court.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›