this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
497 points (98.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32050 readers
1698 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Knecht@feddit.de 49 points 1 year ago

Every damn time. At work I got in contact with several "AI startups" and only after directly asking if they're just relying on Open AI they finally admitted that they are.
You could really tell they where trying to keep things vague before that.

[–] nave@lemmy.fmhy.ml 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why my startup uses GPT-4!

[–] dsdsds13@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But our proompts are highly prooprietary

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago

Because we hired the best proompt engineers money could buy

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Pooprietary

[–] MrAusnadian@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Wait til they learn AI can provide AI prompts

[–] branchial@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Oh no my proompting my AI model again

[–] Edgeburn02@lemmy.edgeburnmedia.com 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

OpenAI should really do something about the apps that are just ChatGPT clones with a subscription on it

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 38 points 1 year ago

I mean. They're paying OpenAI for API access to run those clones so OpenAI isn't complaining lol

[–] genfood@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s the way OpenAI makes money 💰

[–] dontblink@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] wave@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago
[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Why on earth would they "do something" about them? Companies doing that is literally OpenAIs business model lol

They only gave the public direct access to chatGPT to drum up excitement for it, the monthly subscriptions from people using chatGPT+ are nothing compared to the API fees from big companies

load more comments
view more: next ›