this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
261 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 84 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good, it's going to be important for this tech to be open. Stability has been hurting for support in comparison to OpenAI, Meta, and Google. Hopefully this can really help them moving forwards.

[–] vynlwombat@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Does Stability AI open source their models?

[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Looks like they do have an open LLM model:

https://medium.com/@koki_noda/try-language-models-with-python-stabilityais-stablelm-fdcb631a4a00

What is StableLM?

StableLM is a new open-source language model released by Stability AI. The Alpha version of the model is available in 3 billion and 7 billion parameters, with 15 billion to 65 billion parameter models to follow.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Investing in one company is not a bet against another company.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Especially when stability is doing something completely different from openai

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Honest question. How are they completely different?

[–] Jeknilah@monero.town 1 points 11 months ago

OpenAI is known for ChatGPT, which is a text generator that works for things like writing a haiku. Though OpenAI also has a image generating AI (DALLE), it doesn't seem nearly as popular as its competitors Midjourney and SDXL. People just assume ChatGPT is OpenAI's main product, but they are actually competing on everything.

[–] ramblinguy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Didn't OpenAI start getting massive investments from Microsoft and then became ClosedAI?

Edit: Not that I necessarily think this will happen here. If anything, Stable Diffusion might run much better on ARC cards (or whatever their Neural Processing Unit becomes) and give a viable alternative to Nvidia

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

In the AI race, so far I'm hoping, assuming what they say about them is true, that Anthropic's Claude wins. I've read that the founders were former OpenAI employees who were concerned about macrohard funding and that AI should value safety first and foremost. That line of thinking is something you never see anymore when large companies try to financially back new tech.

Probably the biggest downside is that the article I found talking about them is that they mention getting funding from gøøgl€, which is always a little worrying.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unless anti-trust law changes, Google will just buy ChatGPT and Stability to reduce competition and form a new monopoly.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

???

You know Microsoft already owns chat gpt right?

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well that's just straight up not true.

OpenAI owns ChatGPT. Microsoft is a partner, but not an owner.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

49% ownership means they dictate what Open AI does. Don't kid yourself.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but to say Microsoft owns OpenAI is still disingenuous without that disclaimer.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 11 months ago

It's a distinction only legally.

At 49% ownership and being 100x the value of Open AI that is effectively the same as full control. Open AI cannot blink without Microsoft getting right of first refusal.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They own a minority stake in the company

[–] jomoo99@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True, but that minority stake is 49%

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

Google will just buy 51% then, duh /s