this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
586 points (98.5% liked)

Reddit

20631 readers
402 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hark@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

The rich would rather live in an apocalypse than let workers have some more of the wealth that the workers themselves have created.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Electric motorcycles? Do preppers have an understanding of how gasoline absorbs water from the air and is substantially worse within a matter of months? Even with stabilizer, you get a few years out of it, tops. What are you going to use for the rest of your life?

To be fair, the writers of post-apocalyptic Hollywood movies don't understand it, either.

[–] hello@retrolemmy.com 6 points 17 hours ago

Create your own gasoline refining plant in your bunker and crank out fuel as you need it? Should be fine because motorcycles don't use a lot of gas. But you would think if you had tons of money you might put some solar panel stuff in storage as well just in case

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Could always set up a refinery of sorts.

And while gas absorbs water from the air, I'm sure there is an expensive way to if not outright prevent it, than slow it down way more than current mass adopted storage.

Off the top of my head i imagine some sort of giant glass tank involving vaccums and check valves would at least extend the usable life by a fair amount.

And while there are a lot of popular motorcycles whose gas mileage is little better than a car there are also a good amount with amazing gas mileage.

There's also the possibility of converting the motorcycles to alternate fuel sources like propane or natural gas.

Or as these people are just rich assholes indulging in their fantasies they may really take their cue from movies.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

It's ok, they're gathering supplies for the people. Once things start it'll all be in one convient place to take.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I say that when the billionaires retreat into their bunkers we should all cover the entrances and vents with a couple hundred layers of concrete.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 8 points 18 hours ago

They're just building latrines for future civilizations.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

There are things called bunker busters too

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

Those are too fast. I prefer to let them rot.

[–] SSNs4evr@leminal.space 3 points 14 hours ago

The crappy thing, is that while they plan on a possible collapse of soceity, they could just as easily plan on what to do about all the displaced workers created, by all their technical solutions seeking problems.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would like for them to find out the hard way that the characteristics to be a leader in a Neo-liberal capitalistic society are not the same in an apocalyptic wasteland.

And by hard way, I mean that they would be made the fucksock of charismatic warlord.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago

Theres a book that an advisor for the billionaire bunkers wrote, sorry my phone is glitchy so I can't look it up without abandoning this post. I heard an interview with him where he said he would always circle back to "if you use your vast wealth to improve these societal issues, there isn't a need for a bunker". They won't hear it. They're driving towards the apocalypse because they are all racing to be the richest. Nothing else matters.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

This is my new favorite image

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, like these attention whores will stay in their bunkers and not come outside, like the ppl constructing them wont target them first to get themselves a fortresss, thats what id do if I made them and we had an apocalypse, id leave myself multiple backdoors

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

thier BODYGUARD will be the ones to turn on them first, either tha tor thier harems , or thier slaves. take a lesson from indian govt in the 70s, when the ghandi(ghandis family) govt was in power, the pm was murdered(blown up with a bomb) by her sikh bodyguard because the pm decided to persecute them.

this is whats going to happen to these billionaires, they would have to be paranoid as putin to escape potential threats.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

india loves israel because they helped them consolidate their power, toppled the last of the sikh empire, punjab still doesnt have water rights, ima bring it up whenever since wikipedia says it was an alleged massacre and only like 100 ppl died when eye witness accounts say 1000s, but ppl trust the government here for some reason

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

They desginated sikhs a warrior race/caste, made them their body guards, then werenlike hey we're gonna go kill your people protect us lol

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Well that was because irsrael trained indian military to do operation bluestar where they massacred hella civilians at the golden temple to get to one dude, which is what they do now lol

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

at least we know who to rob.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hilarious and sad considering those techbros are creating the conditions for a possible economic collapse, such as playing with creepto.

Oh yes, kinda reminds me of reading a chapter in World War Z (the book with its dark comedy is still more entertaining than the humorless movie), like how one character found himself on an island full of rich people... Guess what happened next?

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly their bodyguards turn on them and kill them in their bunkers.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 8 points 22 hours ago

A parallel, similar would be ghandis govt in the 70s, was murdered by their own bodyguards because the pm was targeting sikh people for persecution.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 18 hours ago

I think there's a kind of sunk cost fallacy at work with preppers. Many of them start with the notion that it's good to be prepared, just in case. However, being prepared for this sort of thing isn't a casual exercise. It's a whole hobby.

What if the collapse doesn't come? All that time and effort would be wasted. Better do something to make it collapse.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (26 children)

I don't remember who said it, but I think about this comment a lot:

All these billionaires would rather spend their wealth building bunkers for when their actions cause social collapse, instead of trying to prevent social collapse in the first place.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

And they all already have, insane, there is our trickle down economics at work, they would rather hoarde and spend every last cent on a bunker right before they drop dead from old age than give back to the world

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

People are crazy and we are ruled by the crazy

load more comments
view more: next ›