Just saw "days" and "weeks" recently. Both solid films, the first being the best, but not by a huge margin. Anticipating "years".
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
48 points (87.5% liked)
[moved to piefed] movies
4247 readers
1 users here now
Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org
Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.
A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome
- Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
- Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
- Trailers
- Posters
- Retrospectives
- Should I watch?
Related communities:
- !television@lemm.ee
- !animation@lemm.ee
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !horrormovies@lemm.ee
- !martialartsmovies@lemm.ee
Show communities:
Discussion communities:
RULES
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.
2024 discussion threads
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
28 Decades Later will be shot in 13:1 surround vision, captured on the director's watch. And still win twenty awards.
Isn't this just an upgraded Matrix rig?
Exactly:
« Boyle says the 20-phone setup helped them create “poor man’s bullet time.” »
Poor man's? Those things cost more than what they originally used in the matrix. That's rich man's bullet time.
Even if you buy them used? Idk
Yeah, they were using Nokias back then
Is that true?
No just a joke they use Nokias throughout the series because its a late 90's/early 00s film
Its a downgraded one
I feel bad for the people having to carry that setup.
Pretty lightweight compared to the traditional alternative, no?
Boyle uses low budget guerilla film techniques for feature films sometimes. 28 Days was the first feature shot on consumer tape cameras, Canon X1 I think, and they compensated by using a lot of them at once.
Most expensive scene was an empty bridge in London at 5:30AM, IIRC, and they only had a few minutes to pull it off. Lots of cheap cameras gives you options, if you can work with resolution and lens and colourspace issues.
I’ve always wondered how such a moderately budgeted movie pulled off the empty bridge
Knowing which palms to grease cuts costs significantly
Looking forward to seeing this!