this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
698 points (96.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

23545 readers
2024 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, do y'all call main() in the if block or do you just put the code you want to run in the if block?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

wait till you see

if __name__ = "__main__":

   main()
`
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Luckily Python is one step ahead:

Python 3.13.3 (main, Apr 22 2025, 00:00:00) [GCC 15.0.1 20250418 (Red Hat 15.0.1-0)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> if __name__ = "__main__":
... 
...    main()
...    
    File "<python-input-0>", line 1
    if __name__ = "__main__":
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax. Maybe you meant '==' or ':=' instead of '='?

Also TIL that := is a thing in Python.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

yea I also couldnt get the formatting to work right, triple quotes kept turning things into accented letters, so I gave up.

and also := also known as the walrus operator is very fun and sometimes very convenient to use

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've always found needing to manually add a class instance parameter (i.e. self) to every object method really weird. And the constructors being named __init__. Not having multiple dispatch is kinda annoying too. Needing to use decorators for class methods, static methods, and abstract classes is also annoying. Now that I think about it, Python kinda sucks (even though it's the language I use the most, lol).

[–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nah self is quite important. The main part of a method is to access the state of the object. self is just the interface to it.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 4 points 12 hours ago

Guess I just prefer languages that do it this way:

class AClass {
  var aProp = 0

  fun aMethod() {
    aProp++
  }
}

Though I suppose confusion and bugs can happen when you do something like:

class AClass {
  var aProp = 0

  fun aMethod(aProp: Int) {
    // `this.aProp` is needed to access the property
  }
}
[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The if block is where my arg parser goes

[–] JATtho@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I would put my code in a def main(), so that the local names don't escape into the module scope:

if __name__ == '__main__':
    def main():
        print('/s')
    main()

(I didn't see this one yet here.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One thing I really dislike about Python is the double underscore thing, just really looks ugly to me and feels excessive. Just give me my flow control characters that aren't whitespace

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] d_k_bo@feddit.org 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Still better than having to create a new class just to implement

public static void main(String[] args) {}

Relevant Fireship video: https://youtu.be/m4-HM_sCvtQ

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

Impossible.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 1 day ago

Only took 27 years to make the Java "Hello, world!" kinda sane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] embed_me@programming.dev 44 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Sometimes I have the misfortune of working with python code written by someone else and I wonder how a language like this became anything more than a scripting language

[–] addie@feddit.uk 36 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I feel that Python is a bit of a 'Microsoft Word' of languages. Your own scripts are obviously completely fine, using a sensible and pragmatic selection of the language features in a robust fashion, but everyone else's are absurd collections of hacks that fall to pieces at the first modification.

To an extent, 'other people's C++ / Bash scripts' have the same problem. I'm usually okay with 'other people's Java', which to me is one of the big selling points of the language - the slight wordiness and lack of 'really stupid shit' makes collaboration easier.

Now, a Python script that's more than about two pages long? That makes me question its utility. The 'duck typing' everywhere makes any code that you can't 'keep in your head' very difficult to reason about.

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

other people's Java

I'm gonna have to disagree here, it's always a guessing game of how many layers of abstraction they've used to seemingly avoid writing any implementation code... Can't put the code related to "bicycles" in the Bicycle class, no, that obviously goes in WheeledDeviceServiceFactoryBeanImpl that's in the 'utils' package.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 1 points 19 hours ago

Enough of that crazy talk - plainly WheeledDeviceServiceFactoryBeanImpl is where the dependency injection annotations are placed. If you can decide what the code does without stepping through it with a debugger, and any backtrace doesn't have at least two hundred lines of Spring boot, then plainly it isn't enterprise enough.

Fair enough, though. You can write stupid overly-abstract shit in any language, but Java does encourage it.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

It really doesn't. It's a scripting language, functions are there but at it's core it runs a script. The issue is that it was so easy to start with that people started doing everything in it, even though it sucks for anything past complex scripts

It is the excel of databases.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago (16 children)

What's the difference between a "scripting" language and a "real" one?

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

A scripting language controls an existing binary. A non-scripting language is used to create a new binary.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Scripting languages are real. Generally people consider dynamic languages scripting languages but it's not that simple.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] arschflugkoerper@feddit.org 85 points 2 days ago (12 children)

What kind of psychopath would put the code in the if block.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Looks at all the Python scripts in my bin folder that I wrote.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 63 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Never heard of

def main():
    pass

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

?

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 48 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I remember how weird this looked the first time I saw it and while I may now understand it, it still looks jank af

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago

Python: I'm so readable that I'm practically executable pseudo-code

Also Python: if __name__ == '__main__': . . .

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does everyone call the function of the script main? I never use main(), just call the function what the program is supposed to do, this program calculates the IBNR? The function is called calculate_IBNR(), then at the end of the script if name = 'main': calculate_IBNR(test_params) to test de script, then is imported into a tkinter script to be converter to an exe with pyinstaller

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

All of mine are called do_thing() because after a few days of working on it, the scope creep always means the original name was wrong anyway.

[–] _____@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Python people explaining fail to see the point: Yes we know dunders exist. We just want you to say: "Yeah, that is a bit hacky, isn't it?"

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›