this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1613 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

69771 readers
5161 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 112 points 1 day ago

can't believe a social network started by incels in college to rate girls sexually would do something like this.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

lol, Jesus. It is like what a screen writer would come up with for a movie that contained a terrible company run by terrible people doing stuff so outlandishly terrible everyone watching would think "the absurdity of the terrible is how you know it is made up".

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago (6 children)

That's 0% surprising. FB had always been about making girls feel bad. It's in its sorce code

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Facebook... now even more toxic than previously known!

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 350 points 1 day ago (3 children)

At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

[–] land@lemmy.dbzer0.com 129 points 1 day ago (5 children)

💯 Big tech companies think they’re above the law.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 142 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thus far, they’d basically be right. Any fines are simply chocked up to “cost of doing business” expenses and since no one wants to either make solid laws against this stuff OR hold them accountable for current ones, they’ll just keep at it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (13 children)

It’s so much bigger than this. It starts young. iPad kids. Strict gender roles. Sexualization of children. Learning from parents who have been conditioned by capitalism, sexism and more. We got little girls that want skincare products and teens talking about plastic surgery. It’s bad.

Agreed though. Punish people for ruining society. I think I read a while ago that France had required social media posts to flag when images have been altered. We need more laws like this too.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TIL teen girls still used Facebook.

[–] guywithoutaname@lemm.ee 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Instagram too according to the article.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I get Instagram (lots of creative types there), Facebook is a bit surprising though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 89 points 1 day ago (26 children)

Teenagers should not be on social media. I rest my case.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just teenagers. Facebook and quite a few others should outright be banned. Not only they are scientifically proven to be a mental health catastrophe and a political threat to democracy, it's also pretty clear now that both these things are part of their design, not bugs or unintended emerging properties.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 147 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Saint Luigi deliver us from villains like Facebook

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Even though Luigi Mangione didn't actually commit any crime and his trial is a flimsy sham, I agree. He is the public face of whoever really did it, and they are an icon of justice.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Happy I got AdNauseam after uBlock Origin. Deleted my facebook a year ago, shit is an AI slopfest built upon the greed and manipulation of every part of the chain. Defcon 31 has a good talk that brings this up. "Disenshittify or die" by Cory Doctrow, cann recommend to watch.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I stopped using mainstream social media in 2019 but my accounts are still active so I can snoop on random people I went to college with and holy shit every time I get on Facebook it's so much worse on ways I don't even understand. Most recently I got on to look at something and my feed was completely unrecognizable because it was all AI generated slop from pages I have never heard of and not any updates from people I know. It's crazy what people will accept if it's done slowly enough I guess. I legitimately don't understand why anyone would use Facebook as it exists today. At least when I quit I could at least understand why people used it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Centralized social media is an advertisement platform that targets advertisements according to information & conduct users feed the platform, and some of those users are teenagers?

They're advertising cosmetics to teenagers unlike ever before in the history of teen-centric media?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Goddam I had to read that headline 3 times before I understood the implication!
That is outright disgusting, and such practices ought to be outlawed.
Or as Trump would say, very cool and very legal way to make money.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The book is very good. Reading it now. The writer starts off with a great story about a shark attack.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 109 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Zuckerberg’s $330 million mega yacht may be tracked here: https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9857511

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

even a scathing rant about surveillance capitalism becomes fodder for the machine, as you can clearly see with the ads on this page. 

Ads? I can see no ads...

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 47 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago

That's some cartoon villain level shit jfc

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wonder how much of a bonus the sick fuck who pitched that got for the idea?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grimtuck@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Be aware that the companies would have paid Facebook handsomely to identify users in this way. The world we live in has a sickness with greed for money at its heart.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Who the fuck comes up with this stuff?

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The most generous assumption is that they use statistics to determine correlations like this (e.g., deleted selfies resulted in a high CTR for beauty ads so they made that a part of their algo). The least generous interpretation is exactly what you're thinking: an asshole came up with it because it's logical and effective.

Either way, ethics needs to be a bigger part of the programmers education. And we, as a society, need to make algorithms more transparent (at least social media algorithms). Reddit's trending algorithm used to be open source during the good ole days.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›