this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1663 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

69771 readers
5037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 353 points 2 days ago (3 children)

At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

[–] land@lemmy.dbzer0.com 130 points 2 days ago (5 children)

💯 Big tech companies think they’re above the law.

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

No, they are the system, and the system is held together by the law.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 145 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thus far, they’d basically be right. Any fines are simply chocked up to “cost of doing business” expenses and since no one wants to either make solid laws against this stuff OR hold them accountable for current ones, they’ll just keep at it.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If a law has a fine, it was created to deter poor people.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That depends on if it is a dayfine or not.

A fine of €500 for speeding will only really affect poor people, 30 dayfines which value is dictated by the wealth of the individual is a better system.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

This can be hard to implement and avoidable through "creative accounting" (e.g. living off daddy money with no declared income) so as a hybrid/additional solution fines should turn into penalties over repeat offences.

Some countries use points licensing where your driver's license will simply be taken away if you have too many recent infractions on record.

Companies should also be prevented from doing certain kinds of business if they repeatedly break the law. We have legal frameworks for this, we are just refusing to apply them due to politics and corruption.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago

they ARE above the law, at least it would seem so.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

History has shown that they are.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It’s so much bigger than this. It starts young. iPad kids. Strict gender roles. Sexualization of children. Learning from parents who have been conditioned by capitalism, sexism and more. We got little girls that want skincare products and teens talking about plastic surgery. It’s bad.

Agreed though. Punish people for ruining society. I think I read a while ago that France had required social media posts to flag when images have been altered. We need more laws like this too.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As little kids we got like no genderbased education from our parents. When we moved our grandmother got a lot more control and dumped blue boyish stuff on my brother and forbid the girly things. Has never worn a dress since and now is still not willing to wear one

(it could be that us older sisters influenced that he wants to wear dresses too)

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Bummer. Happens to almost all men in the US. Maybe less now, but this new red pill generation is wild.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I need context to understand your story. How old was your brother when you moved? How often was he wearing dresses before the move? How quickly did it stop? And how old is he now?

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
  • he was ~4 years old
  • i actually dont know how often, but i would guess as often as we others too. from what i understood he actually liked it so often enough
  • a few weeks or months (was 5 at the time so its mostly something i heard from older siblings & mother)
  • 21 i think
[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And mass sharing of images/videos which has made it so much easier to connect people, specifically in one case I saw today of someone on Telegram sharing child porn. How do you even put the cat back in the box?

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People don’t want to hear it, but AI. Used intelligently and responsibly.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the "used intelligently and responsibly" part is why people dislike AI - they don't trust companies or people to use it that way (and for good reason based on the results so far).

Plus, it's not gonna put everything back into Pandora's Box. What we're in is a societal and cultural arms race where AI is just another escalation that's being used by both sides.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It’s funny you reference Pandora’s Box. I often use it to refer to the growth of AI and people’s resistance towards it. It’s not going anywhere. It’s not slowing down. We gotta make it work for us.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

That does make sense, although I'm not sure we can trust it to work like that.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 day ago

How did you see it

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh you mean fines? Sure here's some money $$.
Meanwhile AD rev is $$$$$. Just the cost of doing business!
Hahahaa