this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
352 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3841 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's the smartwatch bullshit all over again.

1 in 10 have one

9 in 10 don't care and never did

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wdym lol smartwatches are everywhere now.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

1 in 10 is still a lot of people. That's like every redhead you know territory.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I think the fundamental problem with the AR glasses is something that can't be overcome.

I think its easy to see the utility to owning a pair of glasses that look good and provide real time information as desired for what you are looking at or hearing.

HOWEVER, I think very few people will want the product these co.panies will make. This will be a method to throw ads literally in front of your eyeballs. Enshitification is too big of a thing now and so any new product is tainted by the expectation it will rapidly turn to garbage at a high price to you.

Also, while we may think we can be trusted, we dont trust anyone else having all that info, I dont like the obvious privacy implications that these can present. Filming with them is also terrifying.

[–] YouAreLiterallyAnNPC@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So, just to be clear, that 'something that can't be overcome' is.. checks notes capitalism?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You might be giving people too much credit here because the same things could be said about a lot of products and services that have come out over the last 10 years

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 27 points 6 days ago

And I care zero about ever purchasing those things.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good, I wanna see Apple flop just like Meta's VR nonsense did.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Why do you people hate VR?

I think it's less that people hate VR and moreso that tech companies obsession with it as a next step in tech and not as a piece of specialized hardware.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How is Quest a flop? Or are you talking about something else?

Bot quest and ray band products are huge success dominating their respective markets.

I really wish people were more serious about these markets so it can be done well from the get got rather than starting to be fixed and regulated 2 decades later.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Having borrowed a quest 3 last week I’ve almost pulled trigger on buying one.

The only thing holding me back is.. it’s Meta.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I feel like it's a CEO's job to care about all aspects of the company he is supposed to lead.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 5 days ago

Nope. Only profit.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Google already made AR glasses and they failed. Not because the product was bad, but because AR is stupid and has such a niche case that it's practically worthless.

[–] Gudl@feddit.org 13 points 6 days ago
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

There are a lot of things at Apple that I, as the paying customer, would rather Cook care more about than AR/VR boondoggles.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Does anyone even want AR glasses? I don't.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 days ago

yes, not from apple though. That's a guarantee they would be useless for a tinkerer

id get them if they were from framework or something and ran some open sourced AR software

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, maybe of ots done well. I have the meta raybans and love them, mainly because I can listen to music as if I had earphones in, and talk on my phone with them, record, and take videos.

If it had a UI to select options and could display info too, that would be pretty sick imo.

[–] red_pigeon@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm curious what drives you to record videos using the glass. As opposed to a phone/camera, the POV is very restricted as you cannot move vertically (unless kneel/crawl and look up/down ofc). So I'm sure it cannot be called a replacement to a traditional phone/camera.

So what is your motivation to use it ?

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Actually I never record videos and rarely take pictures with them. It's the feature i use the least.

I use them for music, phone calls, and AI requests (like having a Google home you can ask at any moment). Once and a while I'll ask it to tell me what I'm looking at to listen to it describe something. That feature uses the camera to snap a shot of what your looking at.

When I walk somewhere and need to use maps, it tells the directions to me as I walk which is pretty neat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maki@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, AR is pretty awesome to be fair.

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Never from big stock market corpos. Fuck their "vision".

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I would love to have a good pair of ar glasses to play games on my Steam Deck with. Connect a controller, and not have to hold up the heavy Deck itself.

But given Apple's propensity for walled gardens and lock-in, and Meta putting manipulative spyware into everything they make, these hypothetical glasses won't be coming from either of those companies.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

I've got prosaspoagnosia, I just want them to display little name tags under the faces of people that I know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Classic Tim Apple.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think this is a case where the imagination is much, much better than the reality.

For the mobilization of technology, miniaturization has had a lot of benefits, not just in the technology, but in the accessibility. Having a desktop computer instead of a mainframe was huge. It brought the computer to the home. Laptops becoming viable was huge again. It untethered the computer from the wall. For most of the planet, we're still in the midst of the massive leap that is smart phones. It put a computer in the pocket of billions of people.

Beating that is hard. Smart phones are the most accessible, most powerful devices most end users have ever used. We take that for granted, and we take the time it took to get there for granted. It took 25 years of desktops to get real, decent laptops (personally, I'd say mid 90s). It took 25 of laptops to get real, decent smartphones (again personally, I'd say ~2010ish).

Like it or not, we have another decade to go probably before the technology is there for the next evolution in personal computing. But the problem we have really is that there's not another leap as far as accessibility is concerned. Smart phones work places where laptops can't. Laptops work places where desktops can't. Desktops work places where mainframes can't. Smart phones can work anywhere. Taking the computer from the datacenter, to the home, to your backpack, to your pocket is huge. Is the next step from the pocket to your wrist? To your face? Is it worth it? Is it really that much better?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alehel@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't want ads thrown into my eyeballs. So that's a big no from me.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

I agree with you fully. It's a sad state that we can't even imagine wearable glasses tech without invasive ads

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago

I'd be a little more enthused if both companies main goal from this wasn't to make us work while wearing them.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago

They would have to be so good to be what these guys want them to be and the technology is just not there yet.

load more comments
view more: next ›