this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023

67 points (92.4% liked)

News

22839 readers

3674 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

Inside ICE’s Database for Finding ‘Derogatory’ Online Speech (www.404media.co)

submitted 10 months ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has used a system called Giant Oak Search Technology (GOST) to help the agency scrutinize social media posts, determine if they are “derogatory” to the U.S., and then use that information as part of immigration enforcement, according to a new cache of documents reviewed by 404 Media.

The documents peel back the curtain on a powerful system, both in a technological and a policy sense—how information is processed and used to decide who is allowed to remain in the country and who is not.

...

DHS has used GOST since 2014, according to a page of the user guide. In turn, ICE has paid Giant Oak Inc., the company behind the system, in excess of $10 million since 2017, according to public procurement records. A Giant Oak and DHS contract ended in August 2022, according to the records. Records also show Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the State Department, the Air Force, and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service which is part of the U.S. Treasury have all paid for Giant Oak services over the last nearly ten years.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I'm sure it's very accurate and never causes false positives

[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

help the agency scrutinize social media posts, determine if they are “derogatory” to the U.S.,

Well, lets add one more to my file I guess.

Fuck the United States for dystopia BS like this.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Oh look, another reason ICE can go fuck itself!

[+] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de -9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

$10M since 2017, that sounds like chump change in terms of government spending.

And btw, what's wrong with it? If you have been posting inflammatory shit about the country you are trying to immograte to, shouldn't that be considered a red flag? Would you like a human to review these posts instead, an even harder black box to critique?

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The founders said freedom of speech was a god given right. Every penny spent was wasted.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Free speech does not mean that one's speech won't draw attention. And looking at social media has been something which has been considered in the wake of attacks. It doesn't seem to crazy to say, "if you're applying for a visa to enter the US and your social media is full of "Death to America" or the like, maybe you shouldn't get a visa". Or, imagine some right-wing nut-job going off about how liberal teachers are brainwashing children and they should all be gunned down. That sort of thing probably should prompt a bit of scrutiny.

It's a tough balancing act. We ask the DHS and it's subsidiaries to detect and prevent attacks on US soil. And that's an important goal and they need to be able to look critically and people entering the US to do that job. At the same time, it's very easy for this sort of thing to fall into racism and ignore actual warning signs. Personally, I see it as less of a problem that they DHS et. al. are looking into social media and would worry more about the lack of transparency and oversight. Any such system needs a very strong set of policies and procedures on how investigations are started, conducted and determinations made. All those records need to then be handed off to a different agency, outside the chain of command of the DHS for review and adverse actions, if there is abuse. And I'd place a very large bet on that last bit not happening.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Right wing partisans in the government refuse to enforce rule of law when their own guys warrant intervention by law enforcement so your argument(s) fails the instant it makes contact with reality. You said we should scrutinize but they already refused to do it. Why is more money and more authority going to change that? It won't, and even if it did, it's unconstitutional.