this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Unixporn

15132 readers
133 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No Defaults
  3. Busy Screenshots
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW
  7. No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Microsoft designed MacOS

[–] ehrenschwan@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's already Windows 11.

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That is if Apple designed Windows

[–] starman@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks really cool. Also it's the first time I see this distro.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm using it as well. For me it was a great entry point to Linux. I wanted to start with Arch or a Arch distro right out of the box and Garuda works like a charm for setting up and maintaining everything. I will try setting up Arch by myself for the next time, but for now it's perfect for me.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty noviceand will certainly offend someone with this statement but I thought KDE was Windows-like (task bar, start menu, etc) and Gnome was Mac-like (permanent menu bar across top, dock).

The screen shot seems to remind me of Gnome rather than KDE. What are the benefits of configuring KDE to look like Gnome?

[–] torbjoern@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I'd say a benefit is that one can achieve the workflow of GNOME or macOS while having the configurability of KDE at one's disposal.