this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
315 points (97.9% liked)

Greentext

5964 readers
1326 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] softcat@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Anon before being sent to pick tendies in the fields at the debtor detention facility

[–] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

How did they never pay for anything? Shoplifting? Are they literally a statue of a Confederate general?

[–] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 34 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)
[–] tflyghtz@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Welfare hardly finances existance, let alone life. The three I named are more like it

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Why not a bit of all?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Good boy points are not subject to tarrifs

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 114 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with NEET-ism is you eventually run out of your parent's money.

[–] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That's where the goverment suppoorted neet's come into the picture.

I know some neet's who get more money from goverment than some people working 60 hour jobs.

[–] javasux@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Bout tree fiddy

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't feel like someone relying on government helps would think some corporate fascist who generally wants to reduce government spendings represents their interest, but then again I don't think there is a logical framework in which we won't conclude that OP is at least a little bit dumb. But what makes me favour the parents supported hypothesis is the "never paid for anything " part.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

I am from a very poor place in WV where most people are on assistance because there are no jobs.

Trump flags everywhere. Cars driving down the road with no tags or insurance, but Trump stickers all over.

I don’t get it. Well, actually I do.

Religion. The preacher says the gay is bad. Preacher says the trans is bad. Democrats want to extend basic rights to those people and preacher says god don’t like that.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 128 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Fuck you, I never had mine" is definitely one of the positions one could take.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Ah.. It's fair? If wealth isn't distributed well, blaming radical ideas will only fuel the fire. Solution is a much deeper one no one wants to invest into.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I can call it a really stupid take while also acknowledging we need deep systemic change.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I meant it's fair from a common man perspective where the laws might protect you from corporate greed

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Burn the world down and build it back fresh and new. It’s a great strategy when you don’t ask who is building it back and what are their goals? Nobody should ever trust Trump or any other billionaire to be that person.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 minutes ago

Yes, the right idea with worst case motive

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

It's the right formula, but the wrong results.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 58 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

They seem oddly confident in the police state and cultural sharia they voted for will never come for them.

[–] kaaskop@feddit.nl 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Or they don't care. Don't underestimate how self destructive depression can be.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don't blame this on depression. Most depressed people doesn't become fascists. If anything this is their narcissism showing itself.

[–] kaaskop@feddit.nl 4 points 4 hours ago

I dont think al of the people that voted for the annoying orange agree with the fascistic tendencies. It's probably an unhealthy mix of suicidals and depressed people, angry people, fascists, idiots and morons. Neither of these are mutually exclusive of course.

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago

I never thought leopards would eat my face

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 9 points 6 hours ago

I kinda understand their point of view here actually. Wanting to drag everyone down to their level. Burn it all down.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 20 points 8 hours ago

The most dangerous people are those with nothing to lose.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 33 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Some men want to see the world burn.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

There really are an unfortunate number of people who want to see the world burn in some fashion. Entertainment, because they can’t stand not poking a bear with a stick, or maybe because they’re a crab in a bucket and are willing to destroy others’ success because they have none of their own.

[–] Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com 27 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You mean you engineer solutions.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As long as the solution is fire

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What about explosions? Can we do explosions?

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's just fast fire, we can do fast fire!