I've gone that road and I'll tell you that making a windows virtual machine is much less of a headache. I'd recommend using qemu/kvm over something like virtualbox because otherwise it won't be very usable
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
46758 readers
2171 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah thats an entirely different thing. My GPU is weird and virt-manager doesnt work, while OpenGL enabled VMs are nice and smooth but had other problems with the correct viewer and all...
Asked ChatGPT for every damn parameter or viewer, user virt-viewer, remote-viewer, VNC, some GTK viewer.
What's your GPU and distro?
Without knowing those, start here
I have an AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 3500U, Radeon Vega Mobile Graphics.
No passthrough here I guess.
Distro is Fedora Kinoite, with virgl and all that layered
I don't do passthrough on my windows VM, since I'm not doing 3D work it still works with qxl
Why is qemu more usable?
Because of GPU passthrough
Unless things have changed, graphics card passthrough is tough to use because you need two graphics cards. The one sent to the VM can't be used on the host if you plan on using the guest. For laptops this can be impossible to reconcile, and even for desktops this can be... weird.
Actually, things have changed - you can passthru with just a single GPU now, and for many users, it's actually more stable/reliable than a dual-GPU setup (as you do mention, it can be "weird"). There is a catch however, and that is of course you can't use/switch to your host OS while the guest is running, but that shouldn't be an issue anyways if you're going to be working out of the guest OS. There are scripts available that make this switchover automatic and seamless.
https://github.com/QaidVoid/Complete-Single-GPU-Passthrough
Here's a handy video that illustrated what this looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTWf5D092VY
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=eTWf5D092VY
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
It all comes down to a question of how much time (days? months?) you want spend fixing things on Linux that simply work out of the box under Windows for a minimal fee. Buy a Windows license and spend the time you would’ve spent dealing with Linux issues doing your actual job and you’ll, most likely, get a better ROI. Windows licenses are cheap and you get things working out of the box. Software runs fine, all vendors support whatever you’re trying to do and you’ll be productive from day zero. There are annoyances from time to time, sure, but they’re way fewer and simpler to deal with than the hoops you’ve to go through to get a minimal and viable/productive Linux desktop experience.
It takes 15 mins to make a stable and usable windows VM, also who buys windows licenses in a Linux community
15 minutes and 2 months fixing Wine and countless hours dealing with compatibility issues when someone sends you a doc.
they're talking about a VM, not wine. if you have a powerful enough computer to spare some resources, and don't have a graphically-intensive application, a VM is probably a good choice if you like/need linux for most of your workflow!
What's the point in running all your major apps in a VM? You'll still have all the "problems" of Windows with the additional overhead of having two operating systems running...
Also virtualization is a pain not only for "graphically-intensive applications", anything that uses GPU acceleration won't perform that well, even the Windows UI itself. GPU passthrough is also a pain because it requires another GPU and even then you'll have to get the image back to your system in some way which will have a performance impact on framerate.
i'm not saying that you should use a VM if everything on your PC requires windows... only if one specific app you sometimes need doesn't work on linux!
as someone studying foreign languages for example, i know that if i want to do translation, i'll have to use windows for some specific proprietary cat software. but i don't spend my whole time in a cat software! i would also need to work with email, and some projects would require me to use a browser-based tao software, and in those cases, i'd much prefer being on linux to use things like a better japanese input, tiling window management if on a laptop, and generally, not having to deal with advertisments!
Okay that's fair.
Thank you
I'll chime in to say their "Enterprise Linux" support is (or at least WAS in 2015) merely a wine wrapper. That said, I strongly dislike ESRI and would recommend any number of open source alternatives.
Yes they suck for sure. Its just better to use currently as I dont have to recreate everything, as we pretty much sit there and get a GUI training lol
I’d bail on ArcGIS. It’s expensive and QGIS does everything you could possibly need to do without the price tag, or the windows dependency. If you know ArcGIS, Q will feel very familiar.
Do you have links for alternative resources for data, overlays etc? And does all the coding stuff work similarly?
Yes I hate this seminar. Its basically Microsoft/ArcGis advertising, so horrible
They have plug-ins for web tiles, and you can connect to the ArcGIS map services. It has a terminal, but I don’t use that function much. I generally do all data manipulation and prep using Python and postGIS, and use Q as a visualization and editing tool. But it has plugins for just about everything. Most of the data resources ESRI gives you is repackaged public data, so searching the internet will provide you with most of the layers you might need.
Esri is such a piece of shit. The same as Komoot, but corporate. How can they make so much money by reusing loosely licensed FOSS stuff?
I dont know, I think these projects made a big mistake using so loose licenses
Does it connect to the same arcgis BIM servers so I can work with my coworkers, in real architecture projects?
I don’t work in the architecture space, but a quick search gave me some guidance on how to integrate BIM models in QGIS. The 3D City Builder plug in might do what you need.
ESRI, the Microsoft or Adobe of Cartography. It's a shame that public authorities get convinced to pay double.
If you need to work with their FGDB format you can do that in newer versions of QGIS
Luckily not! Only shb or how its called.
shp? I’d recommend learning QGIS regardless, even if its ui looks like 💩
Good luck in your search!
Shapefiles or something, will work in QGIS. Yeah no way I am gonna use that proprietary cancer
Obligatory switch from shapefile link.
Unfortunately Shapefile is a proprietary format developed by ESRI. QGIS handles it just fine though no problems.
Urg... thanks! I will just have to send this to my Prof and see his reaction, weird Microsoft-Corporate-beard-lightblueshirt-dude
Not sure what your use case is, but consider something like geojson.io if you can export the map data somehow. You might be able to do this from their interface or you might have to do browser network capturing to capture the requested data. It supports GeoJSON as well as KML, GPX, CSV, GTFS, TopoJSON formats.
Qgis has Openstreetmaps data source, but I was thinking of custom community based layers like "all wildfires in 2023" etc
I see. With the link you should be able to query a geojson file that can then be imported into geojson.io. I used Query 'GLOBALID IS NOT null' to get the top 50 of 2000 results. That should give you a starting piont. The first link is just a way to query the data in this link
I'm unfamilar with Qgis but I have been able to import layers into geojson.io before from arcGIS.
A good place to start is Wine's AppDB on their website:
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=1081 (replace & with just a &; Lemmy is replacing this without my control)
It looks like it's "garbage" quality. Someone very helpfully shared: "Program cannot run".
It looks like it's "garbage" quality.
To be fair, that's also true when running natively under Windows.
QGIS is a very nice piece of software, definitely worth checking out. Some of our geographers use Mapinfo (proprietary) but most use QGIS. Everyone hates ESRI.
Some of your classes might require some ESRI plugins... I would check with your teachers if it's okay to use QGIS, they will certainly know the answer to that question.
I asked already and they said "use the Uni PCs but you can also do a presentation about QGIS"
I tried this for the same reasons about ten years ago (college, free, etc) and found it to be essentially an insurmountable challenge. It's a bummer since they support Linux in other ways.
Maybe it is easier now.
Hmm, could be easier and harder at the same time. DRM vs modern Wine