this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
521 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

66785 readers
5760 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Changer098@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 7 points 18 hours ago

I was just thinking that. XD

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just nuts that my 386 was to big to take on my pushy as a kid and now the same thing would get lost in my nose hairs

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Maybe you just didn't have long enough nose hair as a kid

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 171 points 1 day ago (9 children)

The future: we have replaced the microplastic in our blood with microcontrollers

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

32-bit processor, the powerhouse of the cell

[–] dch82@piefed.social 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And each of them is powerful enough to run Doom

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] geomela@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

So right at the end?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you are saying once it gets into your bloodstream you are doomed?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

in every meaning of the word

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I live in Denmark, work in a location with about 120 people. Two of them believe this, and there is a third one who's a massive Trump fan. I try to not interact with them.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

It's spreading around Scandinavia like wildfire, no idea why, but lot of people are scared of this happening.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure they have interesting things to say about the covid vaccines.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago

about ~~the covid~~ vaccines.

There, all fixed now.

[–] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And the microcontrollers to control the microplastics.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nanobots of 90's sci-fi, here we finally come!

[–] Dayroom7485@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I want those fuckers powering little submarines that fight cancer cells right now - but realistically speaking, these microcontrollers would need to be at least one order two order of magnitude smaller for that, no?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

I can guarantee you they wouldn't (solely) be used for pur benefit

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Oh, absolutely. I just mean that we appear to be headed in that direction.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just reprogram viruses (like the microbe) instead. It's easier.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"It does in fact run Doom", he said before he snorted a line of his new favorite drug - a dark grey line of Megaflops.

Wear your N95 around the next gen SoCs. We don't know the effects of inhaling them (yet)

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

We don't know the effects of inhaling them (yet)

Pretty sure I've seen what happens before.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In broad terms, that seems to put it about on par with an Intel 386 chip from 1985

At 24 MHz, it's actually about 4-6 times faster than a full fledged 33 MHz i80386DX with 10 times as many transistors back in the day.
It's absolutely insane that i386 remained the standard with its inferior high latency design.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Archimedes

exhibiting BASIC language performance ten times faster than a newly introduced 80386-based computer

That was an 8MHz Arm system, and it was commonly recognized as being clearly faster than a 33MHz i80386DX!
In fact the 8036 was so inefficient at 33MHz it couldn't even beat the speed of a 16 MHz 80286 on 16 bit code!!
Mips, Alpha, Motorola, Sparc and finally Arm were all better, but they weren't backed by IBM, and the availability of clones made the PC relatively cheap. But basically everything else was better than Intel.

Unfortunately Arm also lacked a math co-processor, so for tasks that were heavy on FP calculations, an i386 with co-processor was superior.
Also Arm was unable to sell them cheap enough to capture at least a niche market. (Apart from education in UK)
And for the hobbyist an Amiga was way cheaper, and had powerful graphics and sound chips.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you. This kind of information was exactly what I wanted in the comments.

As a person who started on a 286 this seems blazing fast. Just wish it had ports for power, HDMI and USB

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

HDMI

I don't believe it has enough RAM for any real video, among other things.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now you got me remembering my 2MHz "big board" Z80 computer I put together in the 80s from a kit. First computer I ever owned. On first power-up nothing seemed to happen, then I turned up the monitor brightness and a choir of angels sang.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is making the Republicans so nervous.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What would you be referring to?

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

Like a solid half of all antivaxxers are anti vax because they're convinced that Bill Gates is putting microchips in your bloodstream to control your brain waves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space -2 points 19 hours ago

I thought this headline was a Clinton joke.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

This article was written by someone who only knows buzz words. They said it's "not just the silicon(edited from silicone), but the entire microcontroller" what do they think processors have other than silicone?

Edit: silicone->silicon

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They're referencing the package as a whole, plastic casing, gold internal wiring, etc. and the silicon die in the center of it all.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today -3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

This still makes no sense, because the gold wiring is a huge cost. Why dafuq wouldn't current manufacturing encourage smaller packages? And there has been a push to make things thinner since ad memorium, so why wouldn't they have made the die slimmer?

Edit: good to know the hive mind still exists.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Work on this stuff:

Thermal reasons, having enough pins and routabke pads on the board so you can land them from the package, mechanical properties (strong enough not to get squished).

We do what we do because it's the cheapest way that covers the requirements and is still easy to assemble.

We slowly move to smaller pitches, but they're more expensive to deal with, you need more accuracy on your pick and place and the tolerances on your pads and soldermask are smaller.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You're asking why they didn't make the package thinner than like .1mm thick...?

Or are you commenting on some sense of surprise that someone would want to make small things, or something? If so, not sure what you're referring to.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today -3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying there is no reason to say this microcontroller is vastly different from current products on the market.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Sure there is.

As far as I know this is the smallest full microcontroller package on the market. Which is what makes it interesting and why we are here talking about it.

Are there others?

[–] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is no silicone at all in microprocessors but silicon.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

You're right, I don't type that word into my phone much so the autocorrect effed me. I'll edit for clarity.

[–] naonintendois@programming.dev 1 points 15 hours ago

You forgot to edit the second silicone at the end of your sentence.

load more comments
view more: next ›