this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1029 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

66356 readers
4550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 6 points 34 minutes ago

TLDR: "we should be able to steal other people's work, or we'll go crying to daddy Trump. But DeepSeek shouldn't be able to steal from the stuff we stole, because China and open source"

[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 7 points 47 minutes ago

Good. Fuck AI

[–] Daerun@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Why training openai with literally millions of copyrighted works is fair use, but me downloading an episode of a series not available in any platform means years of prison?

[–] despicable@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Technically they get you for 'sharing' as downloading is legal in most places, but I get what you mean.

[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago
[–] uis@lemm.ee 7 points 1 hour ago

Vote pirate party.

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What's wrong with the sentiment expressed in the headline? AI training is not and should not be considered fair use. Also, copyright laws are broken in the west, more so in the east.

We need a global reform of copyright. Where copyrights can (and must) be shared among all creators credited on a work. The copyright must be held by actual people, not corporations (or any other collective entity), and the copyright ends after 30 years or when the all rights holders die, whichever happens first. That copyright should start at the date of initial publication. The copyright should be nontransferable but it should be able to be licensed to any other entity only with a majority consent of all rights holders. At the expiration of the copyright the work in question should immediately enter the public domain.

And fair use should be treated similarly to how it is in the west, where it's decided on a case-by-case basis, but context and profit motive matter.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Why 30 years, why not 10?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 48 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

If giant megacorporations can benefit by ignoring copyright, us mortals should be able to as well.

Until then, you have the public domain to train on. If you don't want AI to talk like the 1920s, you shouldn't have extended copyright and robbed society of a robust public domain.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I'm somewhat ok with AI talking like the 1920s.

"Babe, I'm on the nut. I'm behind the eight ball. I'm one of the hatchetmen on this box job, and it's giving me the heebie-jeebies. These mugs are saying my cut is twenty large. But if we end up squirting metal, this ain't gonna be no three-spot. The tin men are gonna throw me in the big house until the big sleep."

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Either we can now have full authority to do anything we want with copyright, or the companies have to have to abide the same rules the plebs and serfs have to and only take from media a century ago, or stuff that fell through the cracks like Night of the Living Dead.

Copyright has always been a farce and a lie for the corporations, so it's nothing new that its "Do as I say, not as I do."

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'd settle for shortening the term of copyright.

[–] SaraTonin@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago

Musk has an AI project. Techbros have deliberately been sucking up to Trump. I’m pretty sure AI training will be declared fair use and copyright laws will remain the same for everybody else.

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

fucking thank goodness

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 39 points 8 hours ago

If I had to pay tuition for education (buying text books, pay for classes and stuff), then you have to pay me to train your stupid AI using my materials.

[–] __UnicornPower__@lemmy.ca 33 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As an artist, kindly get fucked ass hole. I'd like compensation for all the work of mine you stole.

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

I love your name

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 29 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"How are we supposed to win the race if we can't cheat?!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 43 points 9 hours ago

“The plagiarism machine will break without more things to plagiarize.”

load more comments
view more: next ›