this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
197 points (99.0% liked)

World News

34486 readers
941 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thebigguy@lemmy.ml 14 points 17 hours ago

Ignoring Trump is one of the best moves you can do, he’d probably resign as president if he weren’t on television all the time and if nobody came to his press conferences.

[–] dzsimbo@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago

Send RFK... They kinda look alike.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

Iran doesn't take shit

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 116 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There's no point in talking to Trump because he has shown time and time again that his words are worthless. He's also an attention addict and megalomaniac, so talking to him, especially if it's televised and on the world stage, is giving him exactly what he wants.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

They probably saw the Zelensky "talks" and decided to save their time.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 16 points 1 day ago

IDK, he sure didn't seem to want to do any more debates during the campaign after the last one

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd argue that goes for any US president. Even if they're completely genuine, everything can change on a dime when the next admin comes into power.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In a sense that's true for any country, though. The only differences are (1) how often the policy changes and (2) by how much. US used to have a 4-year cycle and much less variance in the policies and so it made some sense to get into long-term agreements. Even in the last 8 years, agreements reached by Trump were continued by Biden (e.g. NAFTA). Now though the cycle is like 4 days and the policy swings are 180°, so it only makes sense to enter into extremely short-term, transactional agreements, or if you have no other choice (like Ukraine).

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's demonstrably false. Take China as an example where there is a stable political system, a single party in charge, and decisions are made across decades.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We can agree that China is a more stable partner than the US. My point is that party leadership can also change there, leading to policy changes - it just doesn't happen as often and there's usually no dramatic swings when it does. It's a scale, not a binary thing.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

That's the whole point though, it's the erratic swings in policy that make the US impossible to work with. China doesn't change policy on whim, and it acts rationally. This makes it possible to make long term plans with China and have confidence that China will commit to these plans. The same cannot be said about the US where policy is volatile and unpredictable.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago

Honestly I think most of the world feels like that at this point.

[–] nicgentile@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A lot of countries by now are stockpiling weapons and weapons accessories in preparation of a war. Talking is leaving the chat.

[–] halykthered@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lots of countries are bolstering forces by hundreds of thousands, even if their current military is in the tens of thousands. It's eerie how similar it seems when the world is preparing to avoid war, and when the world is preparing for war.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

There is no preparing to avoid war. We had a long peace time because people thought nuclear powers couldn't be humbled by non nuclear powers but Russia went ahead and proved that to be a false assumption.

They're preparing for war be out today to or a decade it's happening and likely in your lifetime.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

Tbh, thats the smartest thing evet to say

[–] whygohomie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

His words are meaningless and only serve to please his base, recruit fresh meat, and stoke his ego. It's a pretty rational approach if you aren't part of the base.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Trump voters are such pieces of shit. The sooner they end up in his camps and drafted to die, the better.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 20 hours ago

I think the wise thing altogether is to avoid putting people in camps.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeh it's going to be every voter and non voter getting drafted so it's really not a rational thing to wish for angry or otherwise.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] dx1@lemmy.ml -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The mentality where you think people "deserve" things, I think it's just irrational. If your goal in politics is to do best by all, then you're working against your goal. If that's not your goal, then it should be. Wishing harm on anyone is literally a last resort when there is no preferable option and where more good comes out of that harm than bad - otherwise it's an ethical negative. It's alarming to me how few people seem to have thought through that logic.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

I'm not a pacifist. Save your sermon?

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, if the US starts a world war it will suck for literally everyone, not just those voters. You're likely to be drafted too, regardless of where you live.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I'm past concern and moved into acceptance. Spent my life working in community affairs and human rights and always voted with everyone's well being in mind, and since I have no control over the current situation, I accept whatever as long as I get to watch his voters eat shit. I'm tired of caring. It's gotten us nowhere. My "liberal" coworkers still ignore boycotts and voting. My black and Mexicano bosses tout Trumpisms. My "liberal" family keeps ignoring the coup. I'm done caring. It's clear we are getting what we deserve as a nation. I am sure you feel differently, and that's also valid. But, for me? I'm here for the chaos, atp.

[–] dzso@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey, I mean, thats great, but it's not just the people who voted for him who are going to suffer.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I'm past concern and moved into acceptance. Spent my life working in community affairs and human rights and always voted with everyone's well being in mind, and since I have no control over the current situation, I accept whatever as long as I get to watch his voters eat shit. I'm tired of caring. It's gotten us nowhere. My "liberal" coworkers still ignore boycotts and voting. My black and Mexicano bosses tout Trumpisms. My "liberal" family keeps ignoring the coup. I'm done caring. It's clear we are getting what we deserve as a nation. I am sure you feel differently, and that's also valid. But, for me? I'm here for the chaos, atp.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, we saw similar with the whole US COVID-19 experience, everyone suffers for their choices.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago