this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
423 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60115 readers
2706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ydieb@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish they put up more requirements regarding train travel between densely populated areas.

[–] Resethel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, public transport is the most viable solution for the masses, but that also mean taking money out of the ends of firms (subsidies, infrastructure, etc.), which is not gonna happen without re-thinking our economy

[–] ydieb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. The more efficient the public transport is, the more money will circulate to firms. So not doing it costs more.

[–] Resethel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For sure it will be beneficial for many industries but I’d argue that it will severely impact (in a positive way) the transport industry, and the oil and gas industry as well. Since they have the strongest lobbying force, it’s going to be quite hard to go against them.

Moreover, it may upset the distribution chains e.g., it might be hard to do « right-on-time » stock management when waiting for a train to be fully loaded before chipping, etc.

In my opinion, money will circulate better, but to the detriment of those big industry, hence why it’s so hard for politicians to act on it.

[–] ydieb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So some big companies that deserve no pity will earn less. Will they be opposed to it, of course, but that does not change anything of what we should push for.

How hard it is to implement is an entirely different discussion though.

[–] Resethel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Entirely agree, they deserve absolutely no pity, especially since it’s mostly their capital owners that will loose the most.

As you stated the issue in the end is how hard are we ready to fight for it

load more comments
view more: next ›