this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
573 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

8240 readers
2858 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (13 children)

With a potential for an american invasion on the table, I wouldn't want to cancel that deal without another similar plane deal lined up

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

Immediate cancel. After attitude readjustment, accept bids from Lockheed and others.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

If they were serious about invasions they wouldn’t deliver. We’re better off with Gripens IMO but she’s an even more expensive option.

[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think an invasion could realistically happen. 1. Need congress to authorize a war that would impact U.S. soil and 2. need the military which isn't under trumps thumb

But making sure they have another deal is smart, probably delay the f-35, and get maybe the euro fighter or so. Solid planes and itd be horrible for U.S. to lose a military contract in NA to an EU. Get the military industrial conplex pissed at trump.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the President has a 30 day authority to use the military anywhere in the world. After 30 days he needs congressional authority. He can get a second 30 days while that's going on and if Congress says no then he has to remove all troops within a final 30 day period.

If Congress never says anything then he effectively has a blank check.

Your best bet would actually be to run TV Ads trying to get the military to refuse the order. I think a large percentage actually would. I also think he's going to invade Mexico first and if he does invade Canada he'll do it like the Russians did Ukraine. (They told their troops it was a training mission and then only told them at the border that it was real)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (11 children)

Every country knows the US changes faces faster than my ex girlfriend.

At this point other countries just need to deal with 4 years of this bullshit.

If Trump were to take over the government like Hitler did, which looks to be the case, only then would countries start looking at dropping the USA.

load more comments (11 replies)

Switzerland too!

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

What would they do instead? Get a bunch of J-35s, like Egypt?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

J35 or the new Turkish planes. Or develop their own plane.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Fighter planes are very expensive to develop.

The F-35 program cost something around $1.7 trillion. ~~That's several times the annual GDP of Canada.~~ That's more than half of Canada's annual GDP.

A better bet would be to enter some joint development program with partners in the EU.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

That is not several times Canada's GDP. Maybe you meant many many times Canada's annual military expenditure.

Regardless 1.7 trillion Is a lot of money

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

Sorry. That was an error on my part. I'll correct it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Typhoon/EF2000/Rafale. Not stealthy, but still a superb multi role aircraft.

(Yes, I know Rafale is technically not the same aircraft, but it sprang from the same initial plans, so it's pretty close)

#buyeuropean, I guess

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

From what I understand, those are fine if you're going up against enemies that don't have stealth (and all the ancillary technologies that go with it).

The general military analysis is that the F-35 and J-35 are superior to anything else in the air and are similar in capabilities to each other. Conflicts between them will come down to who can make more of them faster. Conflicts between one of them and an older generation fighter seems to be, they'll blow you up before you can see them.

EU better get cracking and start making stealth planes.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Tempest and FCAS are supposed to be coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Probably be some laid off government contractors soon with stealth expertise.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Already leaked the info to Russia.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] engene@lemmy.ca -1 points 16 hours ago

Let’s do it and replace them with MiGs 🀨

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί