this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

News

25269 readers
4236 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But after several assistance requests were denied or left pending, Russell says the agency has been of “no help” to her family after the late September storm. Still reeling in a world turned upside-down by the most damaging storm in state history, she finds herself open to President Donald Trump’s suggestion about “getting rid of” FEMA.

That is a common sentiment in the mountains of western North Carolina, where living in a trailer with limited supplies for months can try anyone’s patience. Russell, who like many others did not have flood insurance, endured those stresses as she prepared for the birth of her son, but then volunteers stepped up to rebuild her home. Back there now, she can cradle her tiny infant in her arms on her newly constructed front porch — overlooking a heaping pile of rotting debris and two Trump-Vance signs posted to a pole in her yard.

Frustration with stopgap relief efforts has been exacerbated by confusion over where long-term help should come from. FEMA is meant to be a first line, providing temporary housing and funding for repairs while insurance foots most of the bill. It is not the message residents heard initially, when politicians, including then-President Joe Biden, who toured the damaged area, promised residents they would have whatever they needed.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago

So basically, these people don't understand what FEMA's role is (rapid response to assess damage, provide assistance for immediate needs, and help direct and fund local recovery efforts). Instead, they seem to want some magic fairy to show up and pay for all the uninsured things they lost, no questions asked.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You're right, falling short of expectations is a great justification to receive no aid at all. Or in the case of the article, being denied aid justifies denying everyone else aid.

[–] rockstarmode@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It sounds like she received aid, just not from where she expected.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago

that's a good point, but clearly what I meant by "aid" was FEMA aid - because she didn't receive FEMA aid, she is in favor of dissolving FEMA entirely, without thought to what this would mean for anyone else

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

I guess I just don’t understand. FEMA doesn’t do these kinds of handouts, and they’ve always operated like this. If it was trump that was President what would they say then?

[–] ShyCake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago

As a professional volunteer between 2017 and 2019, I've worked with fema as a member of an americorps group. In the practical sense, fema help asses the disaster situation and signs checks. The money pays for the support efforts are later billed to the state, but are offset by volunteer hours (ALWAYS FULL OUT THE TIMES SHEETS WHEN YOU VOLUNTEER). Most survivers don't receive support from fema, but rather from the appropriate government and charity groups.