this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
84 points (93.8% liked)

Linux

50406 readers
783 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Any recommendations for a linux distro that i can set up and be reasonably sure my non techy SO won't break accidentally? The set up doesn't have to be easy it just has to not break once I leave her alone with it. My first thought was popOS.

My plan is to have 2 profiles and not give her access to sudo. I just don't want to have to go into it unless she needs a new program.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Mint.

I have my mum (67) and my partner using it.

Libre office and Firefox cover 99.9% of all the things mum actually does.

My partner uses blender, krita and audacity also.

Auto updates... Almost no tech support.

[–] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Linux mint makes sense. Auto updates and its hastle free for non techy person like me.

Even if I'm doing something crazy , chatgpt to the rescue.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 7 points 6 days ago

Any of the ostree variants of Fedora, be they Fedora Official or downstream ones like the Universal Blue family

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

Fedora Silverblue.

Or really any immutable OS; they would have to go way out of their way to even edit system files, much less break the system. I just recommend Silverblue because gnome is really hard for an inexperienced user to break.

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Semi-serious suggestion: Guix or NixOS. They're not break-safe per se, but if they do break something, you can use the OS' previous generations to go back to an operational state. Just... don't let them use the commands that delete older generations.

(Semi-serious because they're both not exactly mainstream and not eactly conventional in their setup.)

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Yep, NixOS as a base + some Flatpak store for installing apps. In fact, use impermanence to just drop all OS state apart from logs, network settings and flatpaks. That way, "turn it off and then on again" will almost always work to fix the OS.

[–] Duckytoast@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

I've installed popOS to a couple of relatives, haven't had anty issues for a year so far. Can definately recommend!

[–] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Fedora Atomic desktops, specifically Kinoite with KDE6 works well for me, and is basically unbreakable due to the way it works.

[–] oaklandnative@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I vote the same, but I'd suggest a uBlue spin of the Fedora Atomic desktops. They have better defaults (all batteries included, as they say) and are easier to use overall IMHO. Bluefin and Bazzite are both great options, and both offer KDE and Gnome variants.

https://universal-blue.org/

Edit: TIL the KDE version of Bluefin is called Aurora.

BTW, uBlue is getting some big recognition lately. They have been on the Fedora Podcast (official) and Framework Laptops has official instructions on their website for installing Bluefin and Bazzite.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lilith267@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Linux mint is a good, "click first" distro that won't break without root + will be easy for her to use. For something with a more modern desktop and more recent updates, Bazzite is really good at just working and (in my experience) has never broken

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

For me, Mint borked the network after an update. I never got to figure what was wrong - the local network worked, the Internet connection was there and other devices worked through the same router, remote IPs were unreachable so it's not a DNS problem, etc.

But I might have had an edge case.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Bazzite might be what i go for the more i look at it. Thanks

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago

I've set up Linux mint for my sister in law and didn't hear from her the whole two years she was in college. But nowadays we have immutable distros. They're fantastic for a set it and forget it kinda thing. They're solid for those who don't want things to break.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Any of them. Just don't give the root password.

[–] ClipperDefiance@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

This is what I do with my mom and her boyfriend. I've had them on Linux for a few years now and neither have managed to break anything.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Aurora by Universal Blue. She will be unable to break it, and it's so freaking easy to use and install.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Depends on the use case. For example, I actually managed to bork Aurora to the unbootable state while trying to make a VPN work properly a while ago. It didn't live long :D

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’m gonna be the boring guy.

RedHat Enterprise Linux. (Or Rocky)

Most boring distro ever. Install it, turn on all the auto updates and be happy. Install something to take backups. Ignore any new major-releases, that laptop will die before the OS hits EOL.

Benefits:

  • Boring. It’s their tool, not your plaything.
  • Actually works
  • Will be reasonably secure over time with minimal effort and manual intervention.
  • If any commercial Linux software is required, it will most likely only be supported on RHEL or Ubuntu.
  • Provides web browser and word-processing. And we don’t need anything else.

Drawbacks:

  • Boring (for you)
  • Not ideal for gaming

If you install anything else than RHEL-derivatives or possibly Ubuntu on a machine that someone else will use, you are both in for a world of pain. It has to ”just work” without intervention by you, and it needs to keep working that way for the next 5 years.

Source: Professionally deploying and supporting multiuser desktop Linux to a few thousand users other than myself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kittenroar@beehaw.org 13 points 1 week ago

An immutable distro would be a good choice. They are distros designed to be more resilient against failure. For a gamer, bazzite is a solid choice; otherwise, silverblue.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Use Bluefin or some other immutable/atomic distro.

The upside is that it's rock solid and will likely never fail in a way that cant be easily rolled back. The downside being that it's slightly more complex to administer than a traditional distro model (which probably isn't a big problem if you are going to be administering your SO's PC for the most part.)

Bluefin is basically a more general desktop, less gaming-focused version of Bazzite. Bluefin uses Gnome, but there's also a KDE Plasma version called Aurora.

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Since less techy people tend to use more the mouse/touchpad anyways, I would pick a hard-to-mess-with desktop environment like Cinnamon or Gnome. With KDE, XFCE and such you can screw panels really easily if you don't know what you're doing.
Slap Debian under it and there you go

[–] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any immutable distro would do I guess

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

That is, if you have experience running immutable distros yourself and are able to serve as a tech support for them should they ever need it.

A lot is different under the hood, and general Linux knowledge doesn't always help.

[–] inzen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I guess it depends what she does on her pc.

But ignoring that, Mint without sudo. Throw in flatpaks and appimages.

Immutable distros are probably fine too but in my experience they tend to be a bit fussy if you need to change something in the system config.

Ubuntu, always a solid choice for beginners but Gnome shell is a bigger change from windows conpared to Cinamon.

P.S. I have Mint on our TV PC and my SO handdles it without issues.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Aurora or Bluefin would be great, general purpose distros. They're based on Fedora Kinoite and Silverblue, respectively, so you get that atomic unbreakability with the addition of some handy software and easy, optional scripts via ujust.

I have Bazzite on a laptop specifically for this reason, so if I ever kick the bucket early, they will have a reliable and portable computer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gayhitler@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does she want this?

If so then just set her up exactly what you have so you can easily help when there’s a problem.

If not then get her the computer she actually wants.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's a no money and cant run windows 11 situation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've got my wife and 5 year old on slackware. They wouldn't know how to screw it up if they wanted to!

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Now that's an extreme choice :D

Doing a lot of tech support, don't you?

[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nope! Everything just works and it's rock solid. It's also been my daily driver for over 20 years.

I was doing a lot of tech support when my wife was on endeavouros and my daughter was on bazzite. Tbf, my problems with bazzite were probably down to me not understanding the immutable distro concept.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I can absolutely expect Slackware to be solid; my concern is about user-friendliness :D

Not the easiest distro out there.

On the topic of immutable distros, I more or less understood them and kind of managed to work fine with them, but, honestly, I feel all they do is enforce a certain way to interact with the system that makes screwing it up very hard - but on the other hand, introduces a slew of non-standard and sometimes complicated solutions newbies won't understand (even for veterans it takes a while to get a grasp on them). If you follow the same pipeline on a mutable distro, you get the same stability plus the ability to do a lot of things without jumping through the hoops.

Right now I ended up on classical non-atomic Fedora for this reason. It features a lot of safe practices from immutable distros - system snapshots before updating, prioritizing flatpaks, container-oriented terminal able to work with Distrobox among all other things - but at the same time it's a mutable distro able to work with everything else.

[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think Slackware's reputation for being difficult dates back to the 90s when all linux was difficult. Slackware has evolved just like everyone else, just differently. It's easy to install, and works like any other kde plasma based distro if you choose the default full install.

The two biggest differences are no systemd and package management. Slackpkg functions somewhat like apt-get, but only for official packages and updates. Everything else can be installed with slackbuild scripts that can be automated with sbopkg. This process is similar to using the AUR with a helper like yay. And I have some flatpaks installed too.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

Fair!

But still, an installation process that doesn't involve a package manager is a bit of a pain, comparatively. Flatpaks may certainly be very helpful, though.

[–] visnudeva@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Or Aurora/Kinoite, for a more familiar experience

load more comments
view more: next ›