this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

movies

2489 readers
171 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
maegul@lemmy.ml
UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
orangeNgreen@lemmy.world
neidu2@feddit.nl
Emperor@feddit.uk
maegul@lemm.ee
BoozeOrWater@lemm.ee
neidu3@sh.itjust.works
TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee
22
Danny Boyle’s ‘28 Years Later: Part 3’ starts production in March (www.worldofreel.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/movies@lemm.ee
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/23954026

Last month, Boyle told Empire that he was going to be directing the trilogy capper, and claimed that it wouldn’t be shot “until audiences respond to the first film.” Judging by the record-breaking reaction to the trailer, I don’t believe Boyle/Garland will have much of a problem completing their trilogy.

In fact, it actually looks like it’s now on the fast track as a recent listing has “28 Years Later: Part 3” starting production on March 31, 2025. The entire trilogy will have been shot and completed by the time Boyle starts to do press on the first one in June.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's crazy. I can only assume this is a low budget set of films? Has there been a trilogy of films released in this way before? I.e. all completed before anyone has seen the first film?

The only ones that come to mind but don't really fit the criteria are Back to the Future: Parts 2 & 3. Also, Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All 3 Lord of the Rings films were all shot at the same time.

[–] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

slaps forehead of course it was! Duh!

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Good call - they were surefire hits and a big production, so, if you have the team together you may as well keep rolling.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

We were already in uncharted waters when they decided to finish a trilogy with a trilogy. In the examples you mention, they had a successful part 1 so the others were greenlit. Technically 28XL has also had a successful part 1, and a less successful part 2. The only surprise it has taken this long to come back for part 3, which is now 28XL 3a, 3b and 3c.

I presume the quality of the story, the big name talent involved, the low budget (28YL 1 was partly filmed on an iPhone) and the quick turnaround meant the studio was happy to write some cheques. The positive reaction to the first trailer can't have hurt.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had no idea this was going to be a trilogy.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

That was always the plan but the speed they've made them has surprised everyone.

[–] dicksteele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I am so excited for this trilogy of films already. Maybe I’m going to be disappointed because I’m overhyping it to myself but I love the idea of 28 x later taking on a folk horror vibe.