this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
240 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55583 readers
630 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 minutes ago

Are the gains self reported? They are probably lying then.

[–] sakuragasaki46@feddit.it 5 points 2 hours ago

what about stremio+torrentio+RealDebrid?

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 5 points 3 hours ago

When you open the app without an account, the animation it shows still says that it doesnt have any ads

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 19 points 6 hours ago

Normal, people show again and again that they dont give a f about the prices, so they go up and ppl still subscribe.

prices will go up until ppl start to cancel

[–] SitD@lemy.lol 75 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

all that to be locked out of anything higher than 720p if you dare use a privacy friendly operating system 😂 right, I'll be holding onto my money then

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 35 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Even Asahi Linux literally had to deal with this just to get 1080p:

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago

This is why I keep insisting that Kodi (and other open source "media center" solutions) really only work for people dedicatedly ripping their own large collection of physical content, or for pirates.

I would kill for an all in one, "single pane of glass" way to browse and watch even just only my legally obtained media library (personally ripped discs amd multiple streaming services). But at absolute best I still have content from different sources all squirelled away in their own separate menus, and if I use something like Kodi for the rips I'm stuck at 720p for streaming (assuming the unofficial plugin for Netflix decides to work that day).

And not even proprietary closed source stuff gets it right. With a chromecast dongle (or whatever they've relabeled it now) at best I can search for a specific piece of content from the main menu, and then it's a crapshoot if say, the Amazon Prime content found by the search is included with my sub or a separate cost. It's a crapshoot if the "link" will just open the associated app or actually take me to the fucking content in the associated app.

I don't get why these streaming services think people care about the brand at all. The less I have to think about the service itself, the more likely I am to ignore how infrequently I use it. The more I have to deal with friction getting to the content, the more I have time to think about if the subscription is even worth the cost.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Even using Firefox on Windows 10, 720p! I cancelled a while back and now I just download stuff.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is incredibly misleading. They lost users in high paying regions and gained in lower paying countries.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 5 hours ago

Lots of people want their chance at being American™ before the country collapses into a different culture

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Wasn't $7.99 the price for standard at some point? I mean, it was easy to predict but they really did just add the option with ads to make it as expensive as the version without ads and then make every other option way more expensive

[–] moody@lemmings.world 18 points 7 hours ago

$7.99 was the only price at some point. Then they reduced the quality of the service and increased the price.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 5 points 9 hours ago

Streaming only launched at 9.99 iirc

[–] Wolfie@lemm.ee 39 points 10 hours ago

I remember when streaming was super new and the service was AMAZING. As time passed; everything got much more expensive, movies and series were removed and now, even ads are displayed to you even though you pay for their service. The reason for the streaming service was BECAUAE of them having no ads. Now all streaming services has gone to shit :/ giving you 720p upscaled but saying its 1080 HD or 4k. Just lies.. Too expensive to pay for 4 or 5 different streaming services to get the movie you want to watch because one service doesn't have what you want to look at.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 98 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t do ads. Seeing them after years of not has a profoundly negative effect on my brain. A slight fog akin to waking up after using Benadryl as a sleep aide, and a hazing of attention capacity.

I’m not going to pay for that impact on my thinking. It certainly won’t improve the world to have more of it.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

God, I have so many of these annoying catchy lines in my head. If I can't access anything I'll just use that Goldberg website to get some classics to read.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I had those syndromes too, until I have quit doing it

Stop it, before it is to late! Please, this stuff is poison to your brain! You suffered enough.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't seen an ad in over a decade, except by accident, which is jolting. The stuff in my head is from the 90s...

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

I see, the damage is already done 🫣

But it seems like you stopped doing it at about the same time as me 😄 only, that I only experienced few years of 90s 🤔

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

Back then ads were quite nice tbh, like they'd actually put effort into it to make it catchy and funny or beautiful. And TV was worth watching. Like the discovery channel was amazing.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 37 minutes ago

I remember TV only enshitificated, except in the state sponsored channels, there we had only a single ad-break in the middle of a movie and none in the night

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago

It's been a long time, but I remember most of those Goldberg "classics" being pretty short, one-note affairs.

And then Schiavone exclaimed, "There it is, the spear! This one's over folks, one, two, three!"

"If that gentleman needs a chiropractor, my brother in law just set up shop downtown," said The Brain.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Just FYI, currently in Sweden I pay the equivalent of about $10 for the standard tier without ads.

They only recently increased it to the close to $10. Currently I am OK paying that since my kid is actually using Netflix frequently.

As soon as the price goes higher, or they introduce ads in any way or once they start peddling their shitty mobile games on the child account, we're out.

They already started to not have non-English audio for a few pretty popular movies, which is a weird move and makes it less usable for us as well.

Already got Jellyfin setup, so no worries for the future on my end.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

mobile games might be the one good thing theyve been doing, pretty sure they released some solid ones, like hades port

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 11 hours ago (10 children)

Fuck them for licencing games behind a monthly subscription. I want to buy Into the Breach, not get a video subscription I won't use to be able to play it.

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Thats wild , didn't know that, you cant own hades on ios or play it offline

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

On android theres prob cracked apks at least

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I have it on PC, but I want to play it on the go. The only way to (legally) get it on mobile is via Netflix. I'd buy it, if I could, it'd be worth it

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago

Don't have one, unfortunately. And I don't think I'll get enough use out of one to justify buying it

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You can play hades on mobile now? It was already tough on PC, I can't imagine how difficult that would be on mobile touch controls.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 2 points 7 hours ago

You can use a controller. I got further in Dead Cells on my phone with the Backbone One than I did on my Steam Deck. Maybe the same would be true with Hades - it’s a shame the Netflix version doesn’t (or didn’t; I haven’t checked in months) support cross-save.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hellequin67@lemm.ee 16 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Sadly I still pay for a service I don't use because I have members of my house who are relucant to embrace the change. I, on the other hand, am more than happy with my Jellyfin and assorted apps to provide my content from whichever source I choose, now if only I could cadjole the others into embracing the freedom of the high seas.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How do your house members prefer this service over jellyfin, if you are running it anyway 🤨?

[–] hellequin67@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

At this point your guess is as good as mine. I e also set up Jellyseer for discovery and ability for users to request stuff but still a reluctance to move.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 53 minutes ago
[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 23 points 10 hours ago

I was in a similar situation, I just told them I'm cancelling the account when they added the extra charge for extra users, and they're free to make their own account if they want.

There was a bit of complaining, but it turns out no one missed Netflix enough to come back.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 6 points 9 hours ago

Think of them as patrons of the arts

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 12 hours ago

All that for JUST NETFLIX. What incredible bullshit people are having to deal with.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 10 points 11 hours ago

Was watching a movie on Netflix with a friend a while back and it didn't even support subtitles for her...

[–] cestvrai@lemm.ee 14 points 12 hours ago

Already bailed when they blocked account sharing…

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Boycotted over those cunts platforming that cunt chapelle and never looked back. No Netflix, no Disney, no Twitter, no Facebook, no Instagram, no TikTok, no Reddit, no Amazon, no Apple.

All I need is a ship and a star to steer her by.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 8 points 12 hours ago

I shared my parents' account, but rather than locking me and my sister out of Netflix when they started bringing in restrictions against account sharing, Netflix just…deleted our account entirely. Maybe something to do with my parents being in a different country from me and my sister.

So anyway we haven't had Netflix for like 2 years now thanks to that. Thankfully we've got a really nice…alternative streaming site with all the stuff that Netflix has, and any other stuff available from around the web, with the niceties of being streaming based rather than requiring downloading ahead of time, and keeping your watch progress etc.

load more comments
view more: next ›