this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
338 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

61081 readers
2595 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 274 points 1 week ago (10 children)

No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Ultimately, the board doesn't control who can buy stock.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 126 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel's scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 week ago (5 children)

this is the company that at one time chose to buy mcafee.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 182 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This was always the inevitable outcome of capitalism. Just some rich lying dipshit buying the world.

[–] alsu2launda@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think elons would be needed to be broken down by government like the Rockefellers.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 37 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah.

And there's a very good chance that Elon spends his waning years in and out of every court, trying to stay out of jail.

Source: Rockefeller's biography.

And that's actually the optimistic version, from Elon's perspective. There's been plenty of rich assholes in history that didn't have to worry about the courts.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Epstein doesn't have to worry about the courts anymore

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 110 points 1 week ago (23 children)

That's one way to finally kill x86.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

Bad vibes, I say.

For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

Tldr - it's a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sounds terrible. I'm sure it'll happen cuz we live in hell.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 81 points 1 week ago

Right, because Intel needs MORE problems.

[–] pozzy77@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have to old slogan of intel inside ready to be rebranded as incel inside

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't he busy enough buying the United States right now?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought that was bought and paid for already.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's more of an ongoing project.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be good news for AMD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (6 children)

On one hand “noooo!” But on the other this would be great for ARM and RISC-v if Intel tanks.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Screw ARM honestly, they don't need any help. RISC-V though as the only open source of any significance, absolutely!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s going to rename the i series to something ridiculous like i69, i420, i1337, and iX isn’t he?

The new Incel X series

[–] dfi@lemmy.nz 45 points 1 week ago

This rumor sounds like a crypto pump and dump.

Please buy Intel stock so we can sell ours!!

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I appreciate him doing this after intel lost their magic, otherwise, it would have been much harder emotionally.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (14 children)

They lost it in CPUs, but I think they're actually nailing it in GPUs though (for once(at least for the budget/entry level))

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/elon-musk-buying-intel-could-be-poor-outcome-says-citi-1034241743

This is the only reputable outlet that had anything to say about it.

They reference SemiAccurate as the source, which I have not heard of before, but seems to have a solid track record with accurate reporting.


GET. FUCKED. MUSK.

I have to say, having an all-AMD setup makes me feel slightly okay today, even though AMD is just another shit company. At least it's not in the running to be owned by that fucking tool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

I thought the cross licensing deal between AMD and Intel basically collapses if one gets bought out?

So intel wouldn't be able to make 64 bit processors any more?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Holy fuck no thank you

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who wants to get in bed with Elon so he drives the brand into the ground? How much has Fidelity written down their investment in Twitter, 80%?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yep, he'll do it, the Trump administration will rubber stamp it. He'll probably just keep doing such. Who knows what will happen when someone has all the money on the planet.

...I guess that person's lineage just rules supreme however they like?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I was about to get extremely upset, and then I remembered I haven't used intel since 2012.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is still extremely bad for the industry, regardless of whether you personally use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone is focusing on Musk but uh, Global Foundries wants to be involved in buying Intel?

The same Global Foundries that's utterly incapable of progressing their tech stack?

The one AMD created when they got rid of their foundries and was happy to do so?

That amuses the shit out of me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If Leon buys Intel, then I will switch permanently to AMD or the loser is playing with the market.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Mixed feelings about this as someone with a relatively (per my portfolio) huge investment in Intel. It would result, eventually, in the end of Intel. But so many dumb people with so much money keep throwing money at his crap companies so it might work out in the short term to get out with a profit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be a HUGE Conflict of Interest if he was also a Government Official overseeing things like Regulation and Contracts! Intel would be his THIRD or FOURTH or FIFTH company that would rely on Government Funding!

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

As if republicans would care…

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

So he'll pay again twice the amount of money, then run the company off a bigger cliff than it's currently falling off already?

I'll heat up the popcorn

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lmfao oh man because AMD wasn't encroaching enough on intels market share, make your brand even more political than it already is. Hitching their trailer to a beneficiary of apartheid is notoriously on brand for them though, so there's that.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't need to buy an entire company to control or profit from it... He's really that dumb isn't he. He could do the whole Black Rock thing and control every company in the world, instead he has this idea of just owning everything.

I'm starting to suspect the price speculation of things he owns is by his own hand, nothing to do with the market whatsoever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

Of course Elon Musk wants his grubby hands on the Arizona chip factory.

load more comments
view more: next ›