this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
718 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

60787 readers
3699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fascism is good for business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 5 days ago

wish the eu would just actually ban american companies there is really no need for them anyway

Sovereign citizens are really getting out of hand. Oh wait it's google.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is definitely to avoid the ire of fuhrer trump. It's also coincidence that meta is abandoning fact checking right before the new administration

He will sic the dogs of regulation on them if they don't dance to his tune

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If the links in the article are accurate, this doesn't seem to be a "law", but this thing: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-disinformation

Anyone know more about it than I could quickly find? Is this in any way legally enforceable?

Obviously, I believe that governments have no legitimate business whatsoever telling us on the Internet what we can talk about, say to each other, etc.; but I would still like to know more about this particular attempt by the EU to do so anyway, so would appreciate more information.

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's set to become mandatory, i.e. law. According to the article.

And this isn't a free speech issue. It's about disinformation. Folks can say what they want, but a political ad needs to clearly be a political ad. And disinformation can't be profit motivated.

It's all in the article you just linked. You can say what ever you want, but if it's bullshit, Google will need to flag it or face fines.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Weeby_Wabbit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago (7 children)

France's tech sector: "Zis is mon' Chanz to shine!"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

We need fact checkers more than community notes. Because disproving a claim takes a lot of time and skill, and notes will be abused for financial and personal gain in the long run. Perhaps it is also better to use the word content moderator instead of fact checker, as finding the ultimate truth isn't possible, unless you just present a mathematical proof.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

And not a single bit of this would matter at all if YOU PEOPLE* would just know a damned thing!

*present company excepted, of course.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›