this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
277 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

60787 readers
3519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ok, but that webpad genuinely seems way ahead of it's time. I want a webpad, and I'm 1000000% sure it's software is so out of date it would be like running windows 3.1 today.

Still though. How awesome does the webpad look?

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nokia were doing insanely awesome things with their hardware, beyond basically building phones which were impervious to standard human idiocy (hi, I am an average human idiot).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Anddd now we have boring slab design, thanks Steve Apple.

But there are tries to make flip phones again with bendy screens - too fragile I think.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They released a crude version of the model in the thumbnail. It was the 5510.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had one in high school. The design was kinda gimmicky but the phone had good features for its time. it had an FM radio receiver, and I remember you could even transfer MP3 files onto it, although it was a hassle to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Paywall, so I can't see the others, but the one on the thumbnail isn't that different to the N-Gage

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ToastySaff@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks, was just going to post this. I've added the non-paywall link to the post.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Nokia Jaws was the best.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nokia were crazy back in the day but I think people may remember them a bit too fondly. I remember how whenever there was some new tech or idea they would absolutely trickle them out just to try and squeeze as much money out of you as possible. If there were two new pieces of tech they’d release two phones, with each of them having one of the new pieces of tech. Back in those days they just refused to make the absolute best phone possible. That’s one of the biggest changes that came from the iPhone.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You not think it could've been a cost saving measure too though and that putting the two new pieces of tech in one phone would've made it too expensive for anyone to buy

[–] RiceManatee@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

As a Nokia Mobile Phones employee in the mid 2000s, I can confirm this was indeed the case. The US wouldn't pay over $100 for a handset, and Nokia was already losing money on hardware in the phone sale to have it subsidized by network providers. Nokia wanted to add tech and capability, but the high end stuff didn't sell at a profit and carriers wouldn't sell phones that were more expensive than their customers would pay. Apple was an exception due to marketing as "premium".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›