this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

News

23622 readers
2868 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Facing a government shutdown deadline, the Senate rushed through final passage early Saturday of a bipartisan plan that would temporarily fund federal operations and disaster aid, dropping President-elect Donald Trump’s demands for a debt limit increase into the new year.

House Speaker Mike Johnson had insisted Congress would “meet our obligations” and not allow federal operations to shutter ahead of the Christmas holiday season. But the day’s outcome was uncertain after Trump doubled down on his insistence that a debt ceiling increase be included in any deal — if not, he said in an early morning post, let the closures “start now.”

The House approved Johnson’s new bill overwhelmingly, 366-34. The Senate worked into the night to pass it, 85-11, just after the deadline. At midnight, the White House said it had ceased shutdown preparations.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Congrats on once again doing the bare minimum required of you. You guys are the best.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago

The Republicans don't even meet that threshold.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 21 points 17 hours ago

Meeting obligations would have meant a budget before October 1. Of course they have only accomplished that like 4 times in the last 50 years.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 29 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I have yet to find a news article that explains all differences between bill 1 (the one president musk killed by tweeting) and bill 3 (the one congress just passed). I feel like journalists are going to read this over the holidays and in January we're going to get stories about how lawmakers just defunded the EPA or something.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This is a good summary.

As mentioned elsewhere, pediatric cancer funds have already been restored in separate legislation.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

The interesting thing about the cancer funds is that it was being "held" in the Senate after passage by Rand Paul.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

There were provisions of the CR that didn't strictly have to do with government funding. This is not unusual as these are attached so Congress doesn't have to consider each separately under the rules. Some of them didn't make the final bill (also not unusual). They will no doubt either find their way on other bills or as standalone.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 21 points 17 hours ago

Musk got what he wanted

Also stripped from the bill was a provision that would have limited US investments in China, particularly in the technology sector

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Reading between the lines, kids with cancer are still fucked.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

No, senate dems were able to do some maneuvering to resecure most of that pediatric cancer funding that president-elect Musk and house republicans cut of their CR bill

The house had already technically passed an earlier bill that approved similar funding (intended to be merge into the main CR), so the senate dems just went back to that earlier bill and voted on it and got that passed

See https://apnews.com/live/congress-budget-government-shutdown-trump#00000193-e724-d164-abfb-e7e4698f0000

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 5 hours ago

That's a win, I guess. It's still fucked that the u.s. government spends more per new fighter plane annually than on pediatric cancer research.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Good to hear. Thank you.