this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
143 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

61394 readers
3637 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dodeca@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Threads? I completely forgot about Threads because this is the first time I've seen news about it since the week it launched. And I doom scroll Lemmy Everything every night.

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never heard of the expression "doom scroll"! It's awesome! With your permission, I'll start using it.

I also doom scroll Lemmy every night (which is bad, since I should sleep, but good because I stopped going to Reddit)

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where were you doing COVID? That was when the phrase really was at its peak, as everyone was doing that to keep up with the news.

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I was lucky enough to be working regularly during covid, but I didn't say I've never doom scrolled!

I just never heard the expression on Reddit (which is where I was at the time when wasting... I mean, investing my free time) :)

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Btw, is there a Lemmy app where you can disable infinite scrolling / set to 50 items per page or so?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The problem is that the painfully earnest people went to Mastodon, the funny people went to BlueSky, the celebs went to Threads, and the mid-tier YouTubers and Streamers and Podcasters who have to be Internet Famous every damned day or they don't get to eat stayed on Twitter.

Personally I'm pulling for Mastodon because I'm a painfully earnest person.

[–] Bebo@literature.cafe 6 points 1 year ago

That explains why I like Mastodon! Painfully earnest individual here.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there was only some way for people on different microblog websites to talk to each other...

Maybe some kind of open, decentralized protocol?

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If only. Some sort of text with added extra, like hypertext, and it could be used as a transport protocol. One can dream.

[–] CarlsIII@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

As far as I’m concerned it’s still just Facebook

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They want a social network designed in a way that single company have all control that would be abused after gaining enough users and advertisers?

[–] sab@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Trust me, we'll do the exact same thing again, having learned nothing and with the same exact person on top. Literally the same exact thing that enabled all the fascists some months ago.

It's going to be great this time around!!

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Bluesky is literally just old Twitter but better. Why do people insist on hurting themselves with Threads?

Edit: for those more technically inclined, it looks like there are now instructions on how to host your own Bluesky instance. It sounds like you may need a developer account before you can federate with the official instance though.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Yeah the only problem with bluesky is that it still has such strict limits on who can join, and even who can see the content. Can't exactly make it your online home for announcements and such if most people can't see them there even if they wanted to.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] atetulo@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I'll never understand why people are so excited for something that is proprietary and invite-only...

Oh yeah, they're idiots. I suspect bluesky is paying for a lot of viral marketing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shunir@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bluesky might be better Twitter, but if people doesn't hear about it, or does not want to try it out, they'll stay on Twitter. Or if they can't stand Musk they go to Threads. Simply because those platforms are the biggest there.

[–] sab@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Bluesky is spreading like wildfire in academia at least.

And much like wildfire, it's going to be a fucking disaster. I don't understand why people who are paid to be critical thinkers would jump to another platform owned by a centralised actor. It'll be the same shit all over again.

[–] joseangel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe BECAUSE I HAVEN'T RECEIVED THE DAMN CODE!

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Although with their proprietary solution, there's a significant chance that Bluesky is going to be Twitter 2.0 if it ever gains traction. I'm rooting for fediverse to take off because my social media activity has shrunk to a couple of group chats with close friends and family plus occasional comments on Mastodon and Lemmy.

Idk bro, sounds kind of emotionally healthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think the invite system slows people joining vs Threads easy sign up. I agree that it is straight up old Twitter and enjoying myself on it. I just started getting invites , they go fast but definitely give them out. Seems like every time I see a post about it I don't have a code to give out. Definitely need to just keep one on deck for the Lemmy comment section.

[–] justaveg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know what would be hilarious? Eventually blue sky buys the leftovers of twitter and renames itself twitter. Although by that time it may not be a prudent move. So maybe not.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even funnier would be to buy x.com in the liquidation sale.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see it now

"The site formerly known as 'X formerly known as Twitter'"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been under the impression that part of the reason for bluesky's invite system is to help keep out bad actors. It makes it easier to ban someone and keep them from coming back. Buying Twitter would just open the floodgates.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just buy twitter the brand but keep none of the user lists or tech stack, just the name. Honestly though I've been sick of twitter for years at this point and I would rather it be reduced to a footnote in history, an emblem of the bad times when a handful of billionaire assholes controlled all of our information ecosystems.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The detritus at X quickly bubbled over to the rest of the internet — some of it promoted by Elon Musk himself — to the point that the European Union threatened to ban the app over the Israel-Hamas misinformation problem.

Last month, for example, the Washington Post reported that Threads had blocked users from searching for a variety of terms related to the news, including “Covid.”

The company made a number of desperate changes across its family of apps over the last year or so to try and make users have a more pleasant experience online, tamping down news among them.

Since then, Twitter never approached Facebook or Instagram’s numbers, but in terms of cultural relevance, it’s always been one of Zuck’s only real social media competitors

Today, the prevailing model comes from TikTok, a platform that looks more like TV, with content made by people you’re only connected to as a fan or consumer.

Bluesky and Mastodon, the hippest Twitter replacements, are happy to embrace news, but they’re comparatively tiny platforms, and the fun comes from the network effects of a large user base.


The original article contains 823 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] shunir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] justaveg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lol, good luck at trying to get meta to listen to what users really want.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wait, people still use threads?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heygooberman@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

Be careful what you wish for, folks!

People leaving twitter for instawords deserve to be let down

[–] Darksouls1234@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What will they thread next to mastodon mastodon is the old Twitter, people were brainwashed by these two stinkers

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to overly focus on aesthetics, but maybe Zuckerberg could take a few minutes away from his daily groping of paid-friends, and instead work with an acting coach to develop a look for photos that isn’t best described as Robot Rictus.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›