this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
505 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

60033 readers
2744 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta is asking California Attorney General Rob Bonta to block OpenAI’s planned transition from a non-profit to for-profit entity.

In a letter sent to Bonta’s office this week, Meta says that OpenAI “should not be allowed to flout the law by taking and reappropriating assets it built as a charity and using them for potentially enormous private gains.”

The letter, which was first reported on by The Wall Street Journal and you can read in full below, goes so far as to say that Meta believes Elon Musk is “qualified and well positioned to represent the interests of Californians in this matter.” Meta supporting Musk’s fight against OpenAI is notable given that Musk and Mark Zuckerberg were talking about literally fighting in a cage match just last year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 147 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And, I'd like to add, fuck Musk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But maybe they can fuck each other a bit?

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 127 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Just cos meta supports it doesnt mean its bad. The enemy of my enemy etc etc

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And they make a valid point. Imagine if all startups started as non profit, raised their assets with tax reduction, and then decided to go for profit when it suited them? That’s tax evasion.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Thats a great idea u mind if i steal it?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean zuck and musk don’t want it because it removes an extra hoop that OpenAI has to jump through to compete, but all said and done fuck all three of them for taking another leap in human achievement and making it a “profit for investors at any cost.” And fuck OpenAI especially for pretending that wasn’t the case all along

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And fuck OpenAI especially for pretending that wasn’t the case all along

I'm not sure they were ever pretending. I saw another Lemmy post about the Musk-OpenAI email exchanges from 8 years ago.

They seemed very open that the long term plan was to become a for profit company. They said they weren't ready yet and rejected Elon's demand to make him majority owner and merge with Tesla.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Elon's biggest enemy is his own ego and wanting to be relevant

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Meta sucks, but here they are very right

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meta sucks, but here they are very ~~right~~ hypocritical*

Don't worry fam I got you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironic they are demanding government regulation / interdiction.

[–] cheeseandrice@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Big corp loves regulation of its competition most of all.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Meta is just trying to protect their intellectual property, meaning everything anyone has created on any of their platforms.

Yep, they own all of it, including every single comment anyone has written on Whatsapp.

[–] druge@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

they're also making their own ai and don't want openai to keep being better

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

don't just block them. force all AI companies that use online content for research to move to a nonprofit and require them to provide their source code openly.

tax payer dollars paid to create that content so that means that AI is tax payer bought.

don't like it? train your models on a closed network that's behind a paywall.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Dont limit this to AI companies. All social media companies should be forced to become nonprofits and their code AGPL'd

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (11 children)

90% of Facebook content is AI generated content now. I cant even see what my friends are doing anymore. Makes me want to just delete it. But, I do occasionally see stuff from family and friends, which is the only reason I keep it. Some people I only stay in touch with through Facebook. But seriously, fuck that company.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Here's a thought. Leave Facebook and spend more time with family and friends wether it be in person, on the phone or over text. You'll feel better for doing it and your family will be happy to hear from you. Deleted mine close to 10 years ago and have never had a desire to go back.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

You won't miss it, you think you will but you honestly won't.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Getting rid of Facebook was easily one of the best things I've done. The people that are important will find other ways to reach out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

Pull the plug, you won’t look back.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably the only time this year I'll agree with Zuckerborg.

He’s sucking upto Musk lol

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They love small government and maximum Freedom until they want the government to restrict somebody's freedom.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've remembered Babylon 5 season 4 today. Specifically the part where the "good" Vorlons and the "bad" Shadows started erasing the shit out of worlds inhabited by lesser races who made the wrong choice of having traces of the opposing side.

Point being, you are being sarcastic about Republicans and rightfully so, but Clinton administration is the one that introduced mass surveillance in the USA, and now in Syria CNN praises HTS (Sunni jihadis) and Fox News highlight SDF (secular socialists). Though from what I've read, apparently they really honestly talk to each other, which is a surprising kind of coexistence, HTS leader's words I took with scepticism, but SDF leaders too say they have no problem with HTS. HTS is a mix of ex-al-Qaeda and ex-ISIS, that's how strange this is.

OK, politics again.

On the subject - I think turning a non-profit into for-profit while not letting go of datasets and such, legally allowed to be assembled in the context of it being non-profit, is kinda theft. So Facebook is right here. Circumstantially of course.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hadn't considered the ethics of transferring data acquired as a non-profit. It's an interesting moral question - although I doubt this is Meta's motivation (which is simply to tamp down competition).

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, for me it's the obvious first question. I guess I'm conditioned by, well, living in Russia, where something like this has led to the current regrettable situation.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Not sure which regrettable situation you're talking about there, but as an outsider Russia's current state seems like the product of a century of diverse developments.

I think America's current state is a combination of the public getting more stupid and the oligarchy taking advantage of it and encouraging it. I attribute the stupidity increase to entertainment addiction, starting small with radio and progressing through television and computers to the internet. Lots of people can't even even take a shit now without their little plastic rectangle to stare at.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's a bit more complicated than that.

I think there's a for-profit part of the business and a non-profit part.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The non-profit part used to own the for profit with a majority stake afaik

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

let them fight

oh yeah, the "free" market

load more comments
view more: next ›