this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
146 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7307 readers
604 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 month ago

It's strange that these conversations are happening on Facebook. I'd think it'd be happening in some less public space.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It would be easier to find this credible if the names weren't censored. As it stands there is, literally no way to fact check any of this. Screenshots are very easy to fake.

Do I find it believable? Absolutely. But propaganda is most effective when it tells you something you're ready to believe. You haven't even told us the new of this "pro-child-abuse group." Some kindof corroborating details are needed here.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure why we're censoring these names to begin with. It's not like Facebook posts come with any reasonable expectation of privacy.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

"Taddle tale"

I don't know, it checks out

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

" there is, literally no way to fact check any of this."

You could just read the bill?

There is nothing about sports in the hill, or touching. The good faith section is about protecting persons who recommend, or not, council before parental notification.

Edit: this doesn't mean I support the bill. It even makes sex Ed opt-in except for religious schools...

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

That's not the part I'm talking about fact checking. I'm well aware of how awful the UCP is.

[–] InvisibleHat@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

This is compiled from several posts here: https://lemmy.ca/c/alberta

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh wow they're just saying it

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Close enough for me.

I don't think that the person who originally put this information out there, should have censored any names.

Name and shame. These people do not deserve protection.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Why censor the users?

[–] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 6 points 1 month ago

In case you're wondering...

MAP=Minor Attracted Person

It is severely disturbing that such a group could exist on FB or anywhere and basically advertise their intentions to corrupt children...

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

this is fucking disgusting and makes my anger boil up

[–] InvisibleHat@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you live in Alberta, you should contact your local UCP official.

I would be surprised if you hear back. This appears to be a particularly important issue for their base.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don't but im pretty sure this has been reported already (at least im assuming) or i would of forwarded this to someone i know who works for the RCMP in alberta.