this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36154 readers
1030 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fro some reason without paying much attention to the time duration it took a friend to reply I always end up replying within the same amount of time as my friends without thinking much of it, then I’ll see the time they sent the message.

If a friend replies in an hour I typically respond probably subconsciously in an hour (plus or minus 10 minutes), then realize it took them an hour after I respond. Idk why.

Is this something "normal"? Does anyone else do this?

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago

At a guess, I'd say it's confirmation bias

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think most people do it, too. Probably just one of those weird human things.

On one hand, it's a bad to look "desperate" and on the other hand, I assume that if they're taking a while to respond, they're probably busy and I should hit them up later.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

it's a bad to look "desperate"

I see this from time to time, and really all I can think is “do people really think like this?”

I work from home and a lot of times while waiting for CI I take a look at my phone and oftentimes I get texts and respond immediately.

Who is it exactly that would perceive this as desperate? I’m not going to hide the fact I was at my phone when I was just to make people think higher of me, and I really don’t understand this thinking at all.

[–] EmbarrassedDrum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with what you're saying. if you just happen to be on the phone when someone texts, there's no problem in answering immediately.

I don't think anyone is "desperate" is they reply quick. I just think they replied quick.

If I think they're busy and don't wanna interrupt, then they'll just read the message at their own time. Don't see any reason to play these games.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Me neither. I don’t expect texting to be instant either and basically have the same attitude you do.

I remember for the longest time family would be angry that I texted them at night, and I’d always think to myself “then just respond later?”

I'm with you at texting late. tho I learned people don't silence their phones at night and it may wake them, so I learned to avoid that

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you respond instantly at any point during the day it can mean you're not doing anything the entire day or you're actually desperate for interaction. If you don't feel secure in your relationship with someone you might want them to think you have a lot going on.

Also, some research shows being less available can make you seem more valuable. This article is related to business relationships but it's the same principle. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/18/smarter-living/benefits-of-being-scarce.html

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Subconscious reciprocity due to insecurity and not wanting to annoy.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Much better than those people that send 10 messages one after the other as they think of each thought, and your smartwatch is left vibrating for the next minute 😅

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, my mom does that and it annoys the shit out of me.
However, I've noticed that it depends on who the person sending them is. Some people get a pass, others don't.

I admit that I do that occasionally but not often. I'm usually a combine-it-all-into-one-message kind of person.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Much better than those people that send 10 messages one after the other as they think of each thought, and your smartwatch is left vibrating for the next minute 😅

Hey, don’t talk about me like that!

I used to do these things unconsciously. I'd read the message from the notification, and reply some time later on. So you're not the only one.

But now I notice when I'm about to do it, and instead just reply when I can. If it just arrived I'll reply now.

Only cases nowadays is when a reply requires thought and space of mind for me to reply. so I read the message and remind myself later to re read and reply.

As other mentioned before, I don't see a point in hiding the fact that I was using my phone at this second. There's nothing wrong or shameful about it. Sometimes you're more available, sometimes less. If the other side is busy they'll just reply when they can. you don't need to hold for them.

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's probably that you have a similar or even shared microbiome. Similar living conditions, or maybe your vibes/rythms just sync up over time.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I’d say that’s pretty typical. Nobody wants to pester or to leave someone hanging, but that timeframe is different for every relationship.

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hypothesis: your friends are not too far away from your peer group(?). They share similar hobbies, structures of their days, social environments and occupations.

If they don’t make a conscious effort to answer in a specific time frame it’s just natural behaviour that you respond in similar times.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because you probably think that your friends behavior is their way of showing the world what they each think is reasonable, and what they probably expect in return from others. And you are probably right. You are meeting people where they are and trying not to disappoint them based on what you know about them. This is emotional reasoning so it’s not surprise that it’s unconscious.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I tend to do this as well, I'm not sure why but I generally respond proportional to how long it took for my friend to respond

I think it might just be human nature, because I had a friend who I would talk to and we would respond back very commonly Within two or three minutes of sending the message, and then they went into a mental Funk where they weren't looking at Discord anymore. Due to this they started being hella delayed in responding, and I found that the longer delay that it took them to respond the longer that it took me to respond. The counterpart is also true, when she came out of being in that funk the delay went away again I've never actually noticed that before and it's really weird

I think it might just be something that is common nature for socialization, I think we subconsciously use how long it takes them to respond as a judgment of what is considered appropriate for response time and then without realizing it partake the same way

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 0 points 2 weeks ago

probably people just take about that long to decide what to say and type it out